Campus Shaken by Threats to KDE
Following the illegal entry of KDE sorority on Wednesday night in which a miscreant left a violent and threatening message, many of the sisters are considering moving out of the house. They fear for their safety. The D reported on the contents of the message:
According to sources familiar with the incident, the message was found in the house’s basement. The perpetrator’s message described entering the house, accessing sisters’ personal possessions and committing vulgar and offensive acts inside the house with said possessions. The message called the sisters vulgar names, and the perpetrator threatened rape and continued surveillance of the house.
The message itself was written on a refrigerator in KDE’s basement, and images of it are circulating around the campus. However the widely held consensus among students is that the message should not be published on-line. However, in case anyone recognizes the handwriting of the intruder, here are the first two lines of the threatening text:
A number of people have wondered about the gender of the author (male or female?). Does the handwriting strike you as coming from a man or a woman? Additionally, it seems to several folks who know KDE’s house that that the writer knew details about the inside of the house quite well.
In the wake of the incident, letters have gone out out to the campus from various people and groups concerned about sexual violence on campus:
- Dean of the College Rebecca Biron and Provost Carolyn Dever (letter)
- Student and Presidential Committee on Sexual Assault (letter and the College’s Title IX resource guide)
- Greek Leadership Council (letter, link to Sexual Assault Peer Advocate Facebook page)
- Student Assembly President Ian Sullivan and Vice President Matthew Ferguson (letter)
Addendum: The D has a full report on the incident here. As does the Valley News.
Addendum: The Town of Hanover Police Department has now issued a press release about the investigation and varied safety recommendations:
Posted on May 27, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Coalition for Israel-Palestine on Duthu
Better late than never, I guess, but when one sees the words “it is clear” in the context of a hotly disputed controversy, one should keep in mind that the authors are at least an argument short of supporting their position.
Posted on May 26, 2017 10:00 PM. Permalink
School For Rich Kids
The Alumni Magazine notes a story that played in the Times:
As this space has reported, we give aid to fewer of our students than any other Ivy — and we boast about it! — even though we have approximately double the endowment per student of Brown, Columbia, Cornell and Penn.
In the Times latest ranking, out yesterday, our Pell grant share is 13%, and we rank 43rd in the nation for overall access — even though thirty of the schools ahead of us have smaller endowment/student resources than we do. We rank sixth in the Ivies; Penn is behind us in 45th place, and Cornell ranks 79th.
Posted on May 26, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Whatever Happened to EBAs?
Although the closure of EBAs was presented as a bolt out of the blue, Hanover oldtimers report that the restaurant has been suffering badly for several years, and the closure had been expected for a while. The reason: the College’s interminable, six-week, Thanksgiving-to-New Year’s break.
This misguided policy, enacted by the Kim/Folt administration, had as its goal to save energy costs by closing the College for an extended period, and also freeing many students from the burden of a quick holiday trip home during the fall term. However, it has caused serious collateral damage. As I wrote in a November 25, 2016 post:
Carol Folt’s endless six-week Xmas break has now begun, a destructive exercise that serves to further compress each of the College’s already-short four quarters, and supposedly reduces some heating bills, while letting more students go home for Thanksgiving. Are those our highest priorities?
While we might think of the foreign students who are marooned in Hanover for a month and a half, or have our hearts go out to Town merchants whose sales drop during the extended hiatus, the folks who really suffer from the lengthy break are the College’s students. Are nine-and-a-half-week quarters long enough for good learning? [Emphasis added]
The negative effects on students’ academic lives were apparent very early on. And the writing was on the wall for EBAs well before Domino’s opened up in Lebanon. You see, a business cannot easily survive a six-week dead period — over 10% of the year. Sales plummet, but rent and staffing costs don’t change much. Students had previously been in town during much of that period, and Dartmouth’s and visiting varsity teams used to pour into the restaurant for loud and lucrative events. No more. And there goes your annual profit.
While it’s too late now for EBAs, the College should think of changing back to a calendar that better supports student learning. Quarters that include a decent reading period before exams would be a good place to start.
Addendum: The Valley News reported extensively on EBAs sudden closure: Owner: Everything But Anchovies Was No Longer Profitable (Video with Radio Jingle) and Hanover ‘Institution’ Everything But Anchovies Abruptly Closes Its Doors After 38 Years and Readers React to Closing of Everything But Anchovies. The first story has the restaurant’s immortal jingle: 643-6135!
Posted on May 25, 2017 3:59 AM. Permalink
What Are the Arts and Sciences?
Math/CS Professor Dan Rockmore is an interesting, outside-the-box-kind of guy — proof that a mathematician can, in some cases anyways, have the soul of a poet. He has assembled and edited a collection of essays about the various liberal arts diciplines that came out yesterday, What Are the Arts and Sciences?: A Guide for the Curious. Rockmore wrote the piece on math, and twenty-three present and two former Dartmouth faculty colleagues described their own fields. In an interview with Inside Higher Education, he details the genesis of the book:
The book came from two separate but related ideas. I was enjoying reading E. H. Gombrich’s A Little History of the World to my son — and learning a lot! And I thought that it would be great if there were an analogous book that was something like a walk through the world of ideas, hopefully written in the same friendly, open and inviting manner for a broader but similarly motivated audience: the curious and eager learner of all ages.
This fed into a related constant little obsession of mine, which is an astonishment around how generally people of all ages have very little understanding or awareness of what it is that others do in their work, be they lawyers, marketing executives or bankers. This is especially true about academics — just what is it that a math professor does all day? And moreover, even within the academy, it’s true among academics. The art historian may well have no idea of what the sociologist does all day and vice versa. What is it that they are studying?
I’ve devoted a fair amount of time to trying to break down those kinds of walls here at Dartmouth, and this book is a piece of that, but with a broader audience in mind. I’m a firm believer in the idea that most people are generally curious about the world of ideas and that all they need is a nonthreatening and friendly entree, and that we’d all be better off if that curiosity could be embraced, addressed and fostered.
Beyond the intrinsic intellectual interest of this work, I hope that it will have functional benefits. Where else can a reader get a good taste of the varied ideas that animate the faculty of an Ivy League school? One author of a piece in the book suggested to me that it should be sent each year to all students admitted to the College.
In addition, let’s hope that it is read widely by the College’s faculty. I have often been struck by how few of their colleagues Dartmouth professors know — particularly outside their own division. A work that helps profs build bridges among themselves could have longterm benefits for the school.
Rockmore seems to be making a side speciality of gathering the thoughts of fellow scholars into thought-inciting displays of one kind or another. His exhibit of the mathematical formulae cherished by esteemed scientists opened in late March at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. Forbes gave it a laudatory review:
Titling his project Concinnitas, and producing it using a traditional fine art printing technique, Rockmore reflects the mathematical interest in beauty back on the realm of art. The fact that these formulae do not readily reveal what is beautiful protects them from the readymade criticism that beauty is too easy. On the contrary, these aquatints lend beauty unexpected layers of complexity.
Rockmore is the Director of the Neukom Institute for Computational Science, and holds appointments as both Professor of Mathematics and also Computer Science at the College. In addition to his scholarly work, he is a frequent contributor to the HuffPost and he has three articles in The New Yorker. Take a look at his complete CV here. (By taking the time to peruse Dan Rockmore’s accomplishments, you will understand, or not, why he didn’t even merit an interview in the recent Dean of the Faculty search. Was he overqualified?)
Addendum: The following Dartmouth faculty members present and past contributed pieces to Rockmore’s book: African-American Studies (Derrick E. White); Anthropology (Sienna Craig); Art History (Ada Cohen); Astronomy (Ryan Hickox); Biology (Amy Gladfelter); Chemistry (Jon Kull); Classics (Roger B. Ulrich); Computer Science (Thomas H. Cormen); Ecology (Mark A. McPeek); Economics (Christopher Snyder); Engineering (Vicki V. May); English (Thomas H. Luxon); French (Andrea Tarnowski); Geography (Richard Wright); Geology (William B. Dade); History (Robert Bonner); Linguistics (James N. Stanford); Mathematics (Daniel Rockmore); Music (Larry Polansky); Philosophy (Adina L. Roskies); Physics (Miles Blencowe); Political Science (Russ Muirhead); Psychology (Thalia Wheatley); Religion (Susan Ackerman); Sociology (Janice McCabe); Theatre (Daniel Kotlowitz); Women’s and Gender Studies (Ivy Schweitzer).
Addendum: Right on time, Dan has a piece today in The Atlantic: Getting to Know Your Online Doppleganger.
Posted on May 24, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Roger Gerber ‘59 on “External Audiences”
Phil Hanlon’s characterization of the critics of Bruce Duthu as “external audiences” is drawing attention. Roger A. Gerber ‘59 wrote the following open letter to the President and the Provost:
Dear President Hanlon and Provost Dever:
As a long-time loyal Dartmouth alumnus I read with interest your message regarding the decision of Professor Bruce Duthu to decline his appointment as Dean of the Faculty. Since my wife and I had the pleasure of dining with Prof. Duthu and his wife, both of whom were charming and affable companions, on a Dartmouth Alumni cruise in the Caribbean a few years ago, I was particularly interested in the facts surrounding his appointment.
Your message attributes the opposition to the appointment of Prof. Duthu to “his membership on the Council of the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association [“NAISA”] that drafted a 2013 call to boycott Israeli academic institutions.” The facts are otherwise; Prof. Duthu is not merely a “member” of NAISA but is its Treasurer and is listed on its website as one of “the Council Members who wrote the Declaration of Support for the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions.” Your message states that it was NAISA “that drafted [the] call to boycott Israeli academic institutions,” as though it were a passive institutional act, but the NAISA website lists the Council Members “who wrote the Declaration of Support…” It is thus somewhat misleading to say that the protests were “due to his membership” in NAISA.
Posted on May 23, 2017 9:24 PM. Permalink
Dartmouth Students for Israel on Duthu
An undergraduate group, Dartmouth Students for Israel, has published an open letter to the campus regarding Bruce Duthu and the BDS movement. The missive is an appropriate counterpoint to Phil Hanlon’s repeated assertion at the faculty meeting yesterday that opposition to Bruce Duthu comes entirely from outside of Hanover (go to the extended for the full text of the letter):
On May 19, 2017, the Native Americans at Dartmouth (NAD) organization sent out an email to the Dartmouth community “to address statements made against the appointment of N. Bruce Duthu as the Dean of Faculty, and to emphasize [their] full support for his appointment.”
In it, NAD defended Duthu’s support for BDS, a campaign that targets the State of Israel with academic and economic boycotts, advances divestment from Israeli corporations and has a long-term mission of getting international sanctions imposed on the country.
BDS has three goals: (1) to end the Israeli “occupation” of the West Bank, (2) to grant the “Right of Return” to all Palestinians, and (3) to give Palestinians equal rights in Israel. The first makes no distinction between disputed holy Jewish areas, such as the Old City of Jerusalem, and other regions in the West Bank. The second supports a policy that would lead to the destruction of the Jewish state qua Jewish state. The third falsely implies that Palestinian-Israelis in Israel do not have equal rights.
BDS unfairly singles out the State of Israel for human rights violations and inaccurately argues that Israel’s “occupation” of the disputed West Bank is illegal. It demonizes Israel and holds the country to a double standard.
Its success necessitates the elimination of Israel. The founder of the BDS movement, Omar Barghouti, has confirmed as much, declaring: “Definitely, most definitely, we oppose a Jewish state in any part of Palestine.”
The interpretation of BDS as an antisemitic movement is widely held, and is endorsed by Dartmouth Students for Israel.
Posted on May 23, 2017 8:53 PM. Permalink
Faculty Meeting: Portrait of Dartmouth College as an Institution in Decline
It was hard not feel depressed after the two-hour long faculty meeting yesterday. Weak leadership can wear down even the most optimistic entrepreneur.
The meeting was attended by an unaccustomed group: about 50-60 students (at right) protesting in support of Bruce Duthu, who, they seemed convinced, was done in by people who could only see the man’s race — and not his inexperience and pernicious ideology. They spared the assembled faculty and observers the usual chanting, but they made up for it with finger snaps and catty, unbidden interjections throughout the meeting. Dean of the Faculty Mike Mastanduno kept his cool in an admirable fashion, ignoring the interruptions and waiting out the shallow heckling. Good for him. He ended his term as Dean gracefully.
As for the rest of the meeting, beyond the initial declarations of heartfelt support for Bruce Duthu and the counterpoint from faculty members who tried to get people to comprehend that Duthu’s support for a boycott of Israeli universities was a morally poisonous stance, the meeting was a litany of examples of how little the College has invested in its educational mission over the past two decades.
Too start off, Phil Hanlon took pains — after trumpeting “Dartmouth’s rising academic reputation” and the “amazing admissions outcomes” — to emphasize that Bruce Duthu has wide support among the faculty. Although he never harkened back to the 60’s and used the term “outside agitator,” that bogeyman was his clear implication. Duthu, at least in Phil’s mind, was the victim of the press and other outsiders; somehow the fact escaped his notice that the issue blew up only when Economics Professors Alan Gustman circulated his powerful letter of protest.
Religion Professor Susan Ackerman ‘80 (the same class as Duthu), pronounced to strong applause that, “This is the Dean of the Faculty, not the Dean of the Alumni.” She clearly was on-message: only those awful outsiders opposed Duthu, not the faculty.
Professor followed on professor with excoriations of “small groups of bloggers” (I wonder who?), the usual recitation of received death threats and rape threats (though none are ever reported, of course, to the authorities), “pressure and bullying coming from the outside,” and the mention of “a few wackos out there.”
Professor Sergei Kan, whose appointment bestrides the fields of Anthropology, Native American Studies, Jewish Studies and Russian Studies, attempted a retort, stating that Duthu’s support of BDS positions was “a big issue on campus” among many students and faculty, in addition to alumni, but he was a lonely voice against a chorus that wanted to blame only “outsiders.”
Dean Mastanduno closed the discussion about the Dean of the Faculty by concluding that l’affaire Duthu had “not been a good moment for Dartmouth.” It seems now that the ball will the thrown back to the same search committee that chose Duthu.
However later in the meeting, a suggestion from the floor led to a motion urging Duthu to reconsider his refusal of the Deanship. Because the motion had come without the requisite two weeks notice, it had to pass with a 75% super-majority, which it did in spades. The vote in favor was unanimous, but by my rough count at least a third or more of the faculty members in attendance did not vote. There was no tally of abstentions.
Mastanduno went on to talk about the capital campaign. The effort is focusing on 160 core proposals, which he said have met with an “unenthusiastic” response from the faculty chairs. (Methinks that anyone who has 160 priorities has no real priorities at all). The target for the capital campaign will be announced in September (the figure of $2.5-3.0 billion has been bouncing around for many months), but the formal launch will be in April/May of 2018, shortly before Phil’s five-year anniversary in Hanover. Mastanduno stated that the administration’s goal now was to generate enthusiasm for the campaign both on campus (“internally) and among alumni and other donors (“externally”) — an excitement that he did not feel existed on the campus “yet.” Good luck.
The rest of the meeting described challenges facing the College due to long-deferred actions that were now urgent. Mastanduno mentioned “severe space constraints” due to the fact, among others, that the Gilman/Dana renovation had been put off. In his witty way, he said that “a looming crisis has become a crisis.”
As a prelude to Government Professor Stephen Brooks remarks, Mastanduno mentioned the need to have the College be competitive in compensation “at every rank” — a state of affairs that was not the case today.
Brooks took over, and in his direct style noted how the College had been falling behind its peers compensation-wise in the U.S. News Top 20:
However, he was happy to report that an addition to the raise pool of $1.4 million each year for the next four years was in the works, supplementary raises that had the potential to restore the Dartmouth faculty to parity with peer U.S. News Top 20 schools (no mention of the Ivy League).
Brooks then moved on to faculty research stipends: currently $5,000/year for professors in endowed chairs, and $3,000 for other faculty members. Amazingly these amounts have not changed since 1995 — a period of time that saw an inflation rate of 62.69%. Fortunately, he said, Provost Dever was on the case, and an increase in faculty research allowances was an item in the capital campaign. He stated that the impact of increased budgets would be “immense.”
He concluded by announcing that efforts would soon be made to streamline procurement, support faculty telecom costs with a $50 allowance, improve faculty parking and expand computing support.
All in all, it was hard to escape the omnipresent sense that the College is cash-strapped, and that the capital campaign is needed to finance new investments and other improvements. The tone of the meeting made one painfully aware of two decades of poor leadership: even though on an endowment/student basis, we are twice as wealthy as Brown, Columbia, Penn and Cornell, we don’t have enough buildings, many are in urgent need of renovation, and the faculty is underpaid and does not have competitive funding for research. Oh, joy.
Let’s burst into song: Where does all the money go? Long time passing. Gone to administrators every million. When will they ever learn? When will they ever learn.
Addendum: In addition to the communication to the campus that Phil disseminated yesterday morning, he added a few lines to the e-mail that he sent to alumni:
However, as some of you may know, Bruce’s appointment has been met with significant opposition, particularly from external audiences… [Emphasis added]
An alumnus comments:
Hanlon’s statement that the opposition to Duthu came from “external audiences” is disingenuous. The most significant and public opposition to Duthu’s appointment came from Prof. Gustman, a senior, highly respected member of the faculty. Though we don’t know how many faculty agreed with Gustman’s stance, it’s likely that Gustman would not have spoken out so frankly if he did not feel that he had the support of many members of the faculty.
When Hanlon uses the term “external,” I think he is referring to you and Dartblog. He forgot that you are an alumnus and that there are thousands of alumni who agree with you on issues like this one. I guess Hanlon thinks alumni are an “external audience,” right up until it’s time for him to ask them to donate money to the College.
As does another:
Hanlon only gets worse. Blaming the Duthu fiasco on “external audiences” is a thinly veiled way of making Jewish alumni, students and faculty the villains in the eyes of the Duthu’s supporters. Instead of taking responsibility for his own incompetence, he’s blaming the Jews.
Whoever is doing his writing should be fired — maybe Duthu wrote the letter for him. Do Hanlon and Dever not understand that code words and phrases like “Israeli state, state of Israel, external audiences” all have incredibly negative connotations?
Instead of reinstituting quotas maybe Hanlon is attempting to keep Jewish enrollment down by appointing people like Duthu and inciting ill will towards the Jewish Community.
Hanlon hates bad publicity but his incompetence will keep it coming. I wouldn’t be surprised if the ADL had a comment about Hanlon’s letter.
Thanks for defending the true ideals of Dartmouth.
Posted on May 23, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Let’s Talk to Bruce
From an article in The Algemeiner yesterday:
Susannah Heschel, the chair of Dartmouth’s Jewish studies program, told The Algemeiner on Monday, “Most of my faculty colleagues at Dartmouth are very saddened by the news [of Duthu’s resignation].”
“I was very disappointed that so many people attacked Bruce rather than talking to him,” Heschel said, adding that she maintained anti-Zionists should be educated, not berated.
“I imagine the attacks against Bruce must have been very disheartening to him, and to the extent that those attacks came from the Jewish community and the Zionist community, I regret it very much and feel it was an error,” she said.
I tried, Susannah, I tried. In 2013 and 2017:
Never got an answer.
Addendum: A reader comments on Bruce Duthu’s BDS posture:
In a perfect world, a Dean of Faculty will be an exemplar of intellectual rigor and moral courage. He or she must be able to articulate what distinguishes legitimately-held, well-argued differences of opinion from dogmatic, lockstep, “cause du jour” reactions.
As has already been noted, Duthu stated what is apparently his current position on BDS but he has not retracted his signature from the 2013 document supporting the BDS movement which currently targets only Israel. So it’s impossible to understand exactly what he means by saying he fully supports the College’s position of not supporting academic boycotts.
So — is he lacking in intellectual rigor or moral courage; is he merely expedient; or is he a garden-variety hypocrite?
But he’s further said that individuals have the right to take their own stances on such contentious positions.
OK. As an individual, does Duthu support extending the BDS boycott to China? If not, why? If yes, when will he call for that and encourage his colleagues in NAISA to join him?
It seems to me — as I hope it would to any thoughtful person — that a candidate for Dean of Faculty should be able to clearly articulate the arguments necessary to answer those questions.
Posted on May 23, 2017 3:59 AM. Permalink
BREAKING: Duthu Withdraws as Dean
Bruce Duthu ‘80 has withdrawn from consideration for the post of Dean of the Faculty. The below was circulated this morning:
And Phil and Carolyn followed up immediately with a note, too:
I wonder what was the straw that broke the administration’s resolve: faculty consternation (to be expressed at today’s meeting of the faculty); alumni upset; the potential for the story to break into the national press?
Addendum: Phil needs to do his homework better with his appointments. L’affaire Duthu is but a reprise of l’affaire Tengatenga.
Addendum: A longtime Friend of Dartblog writes in:
As for your possible explanations, I think the one about the national press makes most sense now:
Where Newsweek goes, can the Times be far behind?
Addendum: An alumnus writes in:
You draw your own conclusion. Duthu’s step down is attributed to pressure from external audiences. How about the Professor not being willing to disavow a statement in favor of a policy the college condemns? How about a flawed search process? So, the cabal of “external audiences” has now set back the causes of diversity and inclusion and interdisciplinary study.
Posted on May 22, 2017 12:00 PM. Permalink
White Men Need Not Apply
The astounding thing about the recent search for a new Dean of the Faculty — the one that led Phil Hanlon and Carolyn Dever to choose BDS-signatory Bruce Duthu — is that our two most powerful administrators had the fix in right from the start. Though the College’s professors successfully insisted that the Dean be someone from the current faculty — a person inculcated with the importance of Dartmouth’s teaching/scholarship mission, rather than an academic from a huge research university like Michigan or Vanderbilt (the stomping grounds, of course, of Phil and Carolyn) — our professors could not insist that actual merit be the primary factor in choosing the new Dean. And so, it wasn’t. Want proof?
Here are four accomplished scholars and acclaimed Dartmouth teachers whose names were on the list of applicants for the Dean of the Faculty position, either because they put their own names forward or because they were nominated by others. Though each one of them could be described objectively as far more accomplished and experienced that Bruce Duthu, none of them was even granted an interview in the search for a new Dean:
Clockwise from left to right:
Dan Rockmore: From his Neukom Institute profile (he has been the director for six years): Dan came to the College in 1991, after completing his undergraduate work at Princeton University and earning his Ph.D. at Harvard University. In 1995, he was one of 15 scientists awarded a five-year Presidential Faculty Fellowship from the White House for excellence in education and research. He is a member of the external faculty at the Santa Fe Institute and since 2005, Dan has directed its Complex Systems Summer School. The Institute is the pre-eminent center in the world for research in complex systems, the discipline that brings to bear computational methods for investigations into the structure of evolutionary phenomena. At Dartmouth, Dan holds appointments in two academic departments, Math, and Computer Science. In his deep commitment to interdisciplinary study, Dan is poised to continue and further advance the interdisciplinary nature and scope of the important work that the Neukom Institute is doing. See his personal webpage and CV.
Andrew Samwick: Director of the Rockefeller Center since 2004, Samwick was profiled on Dartblog’s Guide to the Stars. Google Scholar notes Samwick’s h-index of 36.
Professor of Computer Science Dave Kotz: From his faculty profile: David Kotz is the Champion International Professor in the Department of Computer Science at Dartmouth College. He recently served as Associate Dean of the Faculty for the Sciences for six years and as the Executive Director of the Institute for Security Technology Studies for four years. During the 2008-09 academic year he was a Fulbright Research Scholar at the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore India. His research interests include security and privacy, pervasive computing for healthcare, and mobile computing. He has published over 100 refereed journal and conference papers and obtained over $65m in grant funding. He is an IEEE Fellow, a Senior Member of the ACM, a member of the USENIX Association, and an elected member of Phi Beta Kappa. See his CV here. Google Scholar notes Kotz’s h-index of 66.
Professor of Chemistry John Kull ‘88: From the 2012 College announcement of his appointment as Dean of Graduate Studies: An internationally known structural biologist and biochemist, Kull joined Dartmouth’s chemistry faculty in 2001. His research in structural biology and biophysics focuses on the mechanism of molecular motor proteins and the proteins involved in the regulation of bacterial virulence. Kull teaches undergraduate chemistry, biochemistry, and biophysical chemistry, and has supervised graduate students in the Department of Chemistry and the Molecular and Cellular Biology programs. In 2010, he was awarded the Dean of the Faculty Award for Outstanding Mentoring and Advising.Kull graduated magna cum laude from Dartmouth in 1988 with a double major in chemistry and biology and earned his PhD in biochemistry in 1996 from the University of California, San Francisco. Following a postdoctoral research fellowship at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in San Francisco, he moved in 1998 to the Department of Biophysics at the Max-Planck Institute for Medical Research in Heidelberg, Germany. There he continued to use X-ray crystallography as a tool to study structure-function relationships in force-generating proteins. He returned to Dartmouth as an assistant professor in 2001, was promoted to associate professor in 2007, and to full professor in 2012. This July, Kull was appointed to the Rodgers Professorship at Dartmouth College, a new faculty chair endowed by former trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70. Kull has published his work in a number of high-profile journals, including Nature, Cell, Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. He recently began a five-year term as an editorial board member for the Journal of Biological Chemistry. Roughly 50 undergraduate and graduate students have performed research in his lab, which receives funding from the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Kull is now the Dean of the School of Graduate and Advanced Studies. Google Scholar notes Kull’s h-index of 24.
My guess is that Phil and Carolyn directed the Dean of the Faculty search committee to conduct a first-level filter: no need to interview white guys; they were not an option. As I reported following the faculty meeting on May 9, 2016, Phil stated with little equivocation that he had already laid out his search priorities:
My history in dean searches is probably relevant here. In my day I have conducted nine dean searches, all of them national searches. In every case I insisted that the search process generate a deep, talented, diverse pool of internal and external candidates from which to choose. In five of those cases I hired an internal candidate; in four of them I hired an external candidate. Of the nine, only two of the deans I hired were white males; four of them were people of color. So, that sort of tells you what I am looking for in the search… [Emphasis added]
Amazing that Phil could not even grant the four meritorious professors listed above a courtesy interview. At least he should have done so as a matter of respect. But then Phil is not big on such soft skills, which is one of the many reasons why faculty morale in Hanover is at an all-time low today.
Addendum: I expect that other notable members of the faculty were in the running for the Dean’s position, but if they didn’t meet the race criteria, they probably weren’t interviewed either. The above names are the only ones of which the news has come to Dartblog; there may be many others but they haven’t been discovered.
Addendum: The press release announcing Duthu’s appointment listed the members of the search committee:
Kathryn Cottingham, professor and chair of biological sciences, and Mona Domosh, professor of geography, co-chaired the search committee that recommended finalists for the dean’s job to Hanlon. The other members of the committee were: Robert Bonner, professor and chair of history; Graziella Parati, professor of Italian literature and language and director of the Leslie Center for the Humanities; Steve Swayne, professor of music; and Peter Winkler, professor of mathematics and computer science. [Emphasis added]
Note: Very often search committees are enjoined from ranking their list of finalists.
Posted on May 22, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
A Very, Very Fine House
Our Hanover house is a very, very, very fine house with a cat and dog in the yard. We built it in 1999-2000 after tearing down a 1920’s structure that was ridden with asbestos. It is a little larger than most of the other houses in the neighborhood, but we made it fit with the help of some good landscaping and the use of traditional materials and architecture. I think that it looked wonderful on Friday:
The flowering trees in Hanover are in full bloom now. Quite lovely.
Posted on May 21, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Duthu Against and For
After I noted that Bruce Duthu, in his tepid mea culpa regarding his prior support for a boycott of Israeli universities, used the term “Israeli state” rather than the “State of Israel” — seemingly to avoid legitimizing that country — a number of readers wrote in to criticize my assertion. However another subscriber dropped me a line to observe that in the NAISA petition that Duthu co-authored, the words “Israeli state” are repeatedly employed, and the phrase “State of Israel” and even the word “country” are nowhere to be found:
Words have meaning, folks. Especially in an academic community, they are chosen with care.
Meanwhile, a group students, alumni and others under the heading of Native Americans at Dartmouth (may I refer to them equally as “American natives at Dartmouth”?) have created a petition in support of Professor Duthu. A campus wide e-mail was sent out about it at 5:06pm yesterday:
The on-line petition cites an article in The Dartmouth Review by Brian Chen ‘17: The Duthu Disaster.
As of this morning, the petition has gathered 162 signatures (and 284 signatures by Saturday night). Note: the Dartmouth Factbook report that there are 4,027 students on campus this term.
As of Sunday night the petition had 441 signatures from students, faculty, alumni and various organizations.
Posted on May 20, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
$783,890 for a Part-time Provost?
$783,890 is a lot of money to pay each year for Provost Carolyn Dever (that’s what she received in 2015), who is ineffective when she is in town, which thankfully is not very much at all right now:
These days she is desperately beating the bushes for a job at another institution — understandably without much success. That said, if Jim Kim and Carol Folt can parachute into leadership jobs at the World Bank and Carolina, respectively, maybe Carolyn will become the next President of Harvard? Still, what idiot hired her to be our Provost anyway?
Umm, actually, let’s look at the College’s press release regarding the provostial search committee. Any familiar names there?
Dever’s appointment follows a national search facilitated by the executive search firm Isaacson, Miller. A Provost Advisory Committee also participated in the process and was chaired by N. Bruce Duthu ‘80, the Samson Occom Professor of Native American Studies. The committee’s other members were: John Carey, the John Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences; Nia Foney ‘15; Tillman Gerngross, professor of bioengineering at Thayer; Robert G. Hansen, the Norman W. Martin 1925 Professor of Business Administration at Tuck; Maria Laskaris ‘84, dean of admissions and financial aid; John O’Toole III, Tuck ‘14; Yolanda Sanchez, associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology at Geisel; Barbara Will, professor of English; and Peter Winkler, the William Morrill Professor of Mathematics and Computer Science.
“Carolyn stood out among a deep and rich pool of applicants,” says Duthu. “She demonstrates a profound faith in the power of education to transform lives and a belief in the civic imperative to make the academy—and certainly Dartmouth—accessible to the most promising students, regardless of their means. The committee and I could not be more pleased to welcome Carolyn as Dartmouth’s next provost.”
Will Bruce Duthu prove to be a similarly incisive judge of character in his role as Dean of the Faculty — where he will review tenure and hiring decisions for the entire faculty of Arts and Sciences? Not many of his colleagues have high hopes for him.
Note that Duthu’s committee only “participated in the process,” which implies that Phil made the final choice himself. That figures. Phil’s the guy who hired Bob Lasher and Rebecca Biron and Inge-Lise Ameer and a wide variety of third-raters, when he could have had first-class minds who are already on the faculty. As I have said many times in the past, Phil Hanlon has no nose at all for talent.
Addendum: The moral equation that lets Dever fade quietly from the Hanover scene is a problematic one. Rather than booting her out for utter ineffectiveness, I bet that Phil is giving her a good recommendation. And so, off she will go to be utterly ineffective at some other institution. At her present salary of $15,074/week, we are being way too gracious in letting her job hunt on the College’s dime.
Addendum: Take a look at some of the other 2015 salaries on the above list (click on the image to see it more closely). Phil Hanlon at $1,251,216? Bob Lasher at $545,105? Mike Mastanduno at $445,962? Are we getting our money’s worth? (Actually Mike is looking better and better right now, though, please don’t tell him that I said so.)
Posted on May 19, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Professor Bill Cook (1933-2017) R.I.P.
Bill Cook shared the theatricality and presence that John Rassias displayed over so many years. About a decade ago I audited the last course that Bill taught at the College: Early Black American Literature. Though his powers were on the wane, the fiery sparkle and his affection for the authors that we studied animated us all. Along with John Rassias, there have been few people at the College as much loved as Bill Cook:
See the College’s and the Valley News’ obituaries.
Posted on May 19, 2017 3:59 AM. Permalink
No Vice President for Presidential Initiatives and Principal Gifts Yet?
There is one particularly striking aspect about the extended list of open slots in the forever-gearing-up-for-the-capital-campaign Advancement office: the job of Vice President for Presidential Initiatives and Principal Gifts is still unfilled:
In fact, according to the Isaccson, Miller website job profile, the position has been open since April, 2016:
As the above description makes clear, the Vice President for Presidential Initiatives and Principal Gifts position is a critical one in any fundraising effort. This person is in charge of landing the particularly big gifts, the ones donated during the quiet phase of a capital campaign. But it takes time to reel them in; someone new to the job would have to begin a longterm effort at relationship-building — and that process would take place among wealthy alumni who saw their previous contact person depart last year. Best of luck.
For such a vital — and much coveted — position to be open for well over a year speaks volumes about how difficult it is to be employed by Bob Lasher ‘88. It seems that Bob considers that he wears two hats: the manager-in-chief of Advancement, of course, but also that of the head fundraiser. And he has a reputation of being chary of sharing credit for the gifts that do come in. Did he not ever learn in the sandbox that if you want the other kids to play with you, you have to share.
Phil Hanlon has done a marvellous job of putting together an almost entirely dysfunctional management team. He has chosen people so weak that competent professionals in the real world do not want to work with them.
Posted on May 18, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Come Work in Advancement, Please
The capital campaign continues to sputter as we approach the fourth anniversary of Phil’s arrival in Hanover. Though our President has recently been making positive noises to some groups (is this just his usual strategy of talking about success in the hope that reality will follow?), all reports indicate that the unhappy chaos in Bob Lasher’s Advancement office continues unabated. Why won’t Phil get rid of this guy?
I mean, here we are in the midst of the interminable quiet phase of the campaign, and Lasher is still recruiting core elements of his leadership team. Expensive headhunter Isaacson, Miller had eight (8!) senior positions in Advancement listed on its website yesterday:
Using a headhunter comes at great expense to the College — on the order of one year of salary for each position. Filling the above slots represents almost a couple of million dollars of fees for Isaacson, Miller. Well, at least that firm’s capital campaign is going OK.
And the above searches are not the whole ball of wax. Though there is some overlap in the below, even more Advancement jobs are going begging on the College’s own job search website:
In evaluating managers, one test of their quality is the ability to gather around them a team of efficient and loyal staffers. Bob Lasher ‘88 fails that test quite spectacularly.
Another test is their ability to weed out weak subordinates in a forthright manner. Phil Hanlon ‘77 fails that test even more spectacularly.
Addendum: A few readers have written in to suggest that there might be perfectly good reasons for all the hiring in Advancement — like the upcoming campaign. They ignore the fact that this space contained an almost identical post about furious hiring dated May 25, 2015. And a number of the same jobs were still open at the time of our last posts about Advancement hiring dated November 29, 2016 and February 4, 2017. Despite all of this hiring, the staffing level in Advancement seems to have been remained flat at around 214-217 people since 2015.
Posted on May 17, 2017 3:59 AM. Permalink
Bruce Duthu’s state/State of Mind?
A thoughtful reader writes in:
Regarding Duthu’s email, clearly not a lot of thought was put into writing it, but one tidbit in particular caught my eye: “criticism of the state of Israel” (emphasis added).
Now, unless Duthu meant specifically criticism of the state in which Israel finds itself, he may have deliberately used wrong case to refer to the State of Israel, as the country is properly called. I’m not a therapist, but in this case I believe the devil is in the details. Does Duthu mean to imply that Israel is not really a state? He probably wouldn’t refer to the U.S. as the united states.
Here’s an example of the proper use of the case: ‘The state of affairs in the State of Israel is just fine. At Dartmouth — not so much these days.’
One has to believe that Duthu’s attempt at a justification/renunciation for his support of anti-Israel petitions was carefully vetted by the powers that be at the College. Could such an “error” have slipped though? Or is Duthu once again impugning Israel’s legitimacy?
The CIA seems to be in no doubt as to when to capitalize the word:
As is the official historian of the federal government:
Maybe we should applaud Bruce Duthu for having some principles after all. He does not have the ability to say or do just anything to advance his cause, as we have seen from Jim Wright, Jim Kim and Carol Folt. Perhaps Duthu can’t honestly bring himself to acknowledge that Israel is a country. But I wonder if he feels the same conviction and solidarity with the oppressed minorities and trodden-upon women in all of the Arab states that surround the State of Israel? He has not yet shared his beliefs regarding conditions in those nations.
Addendum: An alumnus writes in (unhappily):
FWIW, and as an editor of more than four decades’ standing, I find this State vs. state bit distracting and not up to the standards to which I hold your blog, which are pretty high, admittedly.
I certainly get and share the problems with the whole Duthu thing and am not an apologist for him by any means, but it would seem that “state of Israel” is easily excusable if he was just just thinking of the “State of Israel” as “Israel.”
Merriam-Webster and numerous other dictionaries do not describe this use of “state” as often cap, as they do, for instance, with “church,” in the sense of the institutionalized body. It is perfectly OK to say “the state of Belgium” and have it mean the country, not the condition.
I think that to try to attach possible nefarious intent to an easily explainable (and totally understandable) occurrence is a questionable use of time, space, and credibility.
But he’s got to go, nonetheless.
P.S. Perhaps all this really shows is that he doesn’t know that the name of the state of Israel is the State of Israel.
Posted on May 16, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
The Speech Is On
Even though OPAL still refuses to participate in the funding of this presentation, the resourceful students at Dartmouth Students for Israel have found an alternative source of support:
Posted on May 15, 2017 6:00 PM. Permalink
Bruce Duthu’s Wan Song
Six weeks and three days after Phil Hanlon named him the College’s next Dean of the Faculty, Bruce Duthu responded last week with a letter to the faculty concerning his support for petitions recommending the shunning of Israeli institutions of higher learning:
Economics Professor Alan Gustman, author of an elaborate critique of Duthu’s appointment, responded in turn:
Professor Gustman is right: Bruce Duthu is trying to have it two ways. But he can’t both disavow a portion of his support for the boycotting of Israeli schools, and yet keep street cred with his radical friends who seek to isolate Israel. Either he revokes his previous position or he doesn’t.
There is a curious echo in this dialogue with our national politics. Donald Trump passes executive orders barring immigrants from certain countries, and the courts rule that the fact that these nations are predominantly Muslim is proof that Trump’s order is directed at members of a particular religious group, especially given Trump’s past criticism of Muslim terrorism. What are we to make of Duthu’s and BDS’ singling out for condemnation and boycotting of the world’s only Jewish country?
Again, in order to be clear, Bruce Duthu can criticize Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians all that he wants. That is his right as a citizen, as a professor, and as the Dean of the Faculty (and, frankly, most Israelis are critical in some way of their country’s behavior). But to advocate publicly the isolation of one nation’s professors based solely on their national origin renders him unfit for the office of Dean.
Are we really to believe that Duthu has sincerely put aside a long-held, blanket prejudice again all Israeli professors and universities — note: the fact that his view was/is held against all of these institutions without exception is what makes his position a prejudice — now that he is in line for a position in the administration that will pay him a salary comfortably in excess of $400,000/year. I think not.
Addendum: Beyond thorough, if belated, articles in the Valley News and The D about the Duthu controversy, Phil Hanlon’s choice of a BDS Dean has been all over America’s Jewish and conservative media. See: Scholars for Peace in the Middle East, the Jewish Journal, the Jewish News Service, The Israel Project, the Washington Free Beacon, the Geller Report, Alums for Campus Fairness, The Observer, the Algemeiner, Legal Insurrection, the Daily Caller and PowerLine. Geez, even Ted Cruz tweeted about Duthu’s appointment.
Addendum: In response to Professor Gustman’s faculty-wide e-mail, a number of Dartmouth professors hit “reply all” and penned messages to the College’s professors:
Professor of Religion Robert M. Baum:
The Dean of the Faculty is not in a position to determine whether Dartmouth College is involved in academic boycotts of particular nations. In that sense, this is not relevant to Dean Duthu’s qualifications to be Dean. There is no credible evidence to suggest that he harbors any Anti-Semitic views and considerable evidence of his support for Jewish Studies and for faculty in general regardless of religious or ethnic background. We should not equate criticism of Israel with Anti-Semitism, especially since a growing number of Jews have joined in that criticism. Nor should we assume that friends of Israel are necessarily friends of Jews. Those dispensationalist Christians who strongly support Israel but blame Jews in the Diaspora for preventing the Second Coming of Christ are not friends of Jews. They believe that all Jews must be returned to Israel (that is they should not live in the US) and then convert to Christianity. According to their teachings, Jews must leave America and then cease to be Jews in order for their messianic visions to be accomplished. With friends like that who needs enemies? Yes, Professor Gustman there are plenty of Anti-Semites who support Israel for reasons that we would find disturbing.
I would remind Professor Gustman that universities in this country have more than a history of Anti-Semitism. Many were complicit with the wild accusations made by Joseph McCarthy. To ascribe anti-Semitic motives to a political position without any evidence fits within this McCarthyite tradition. Professor Gustman your attacks on Dean Duthu are not only unfair, but they distract from the rise of virulent anti-Semitism from real religious bigots like Stephen Bannon and Marine Le Pen. I have worked with Dean Duthu on a number of issues at Dartmouth and I am delighted that he will be an advocate for academic freedom and faculty concerns in the coming years.
Robert M. Baum
Department of Religion
Program in African and African American Studies
Affiliated Faculty, Women and Gender Studies Program
Executive Editor, Journal of Religion in Africa
Professor of Religion Kevin Reinhart:
Dear Professor Gustman
No particular political position, by itself, should disqualify one to be Dean of Faculty.
I have decided, for myself, that as it is presently constructed I do not support BDS. But to call it anti-Semitic is to cheapen the term. Israel is a just a country, regardless of its ethnic composition. When it flouts international law, in so many ways, it is perfectly reasonable to condemn its government and put pressure on the citizens who, (more or less) democratically elected the government, to choose a less odious regime.
There are anti-Semites who support BDS, just as there are Jewish-Americans who support the current American white nationalist government. But a Jewish dean who supported the presidency of Trump should not, in my view, for that fact alone be disqualified to be Dean of the Faculty. Silencing, from whatever side and whatever the cause is, I think, repellent to the idea of the university.
Thank you for sharing your views.
A. Kevin Reinhart
Dept of Religion
Professor of Engineering Science Brian W Pogue:
I am so sorry to see an email list of the faculty degenerate in this way. I hope this is not a trend which will continue in such a negative manner. However, I cannot read the emails from Prof Gustman without commenting.
There are few faculty I have known who are as fair minded and open as Prof Duthu, and I cannot imagine how his choice as Dean of the faculty could be construed negatively. I hope all judge him on who he is, and his academic and service record, not on Dr Gustman’s narrowly sliced view of the world. There is no doubt in my mind that he would be a wonderful dean of the faculty, representing the entire campus. Let’s support a campus open to all ideas and discussion.
Brian W Pogue, PhD
Professor & Director of MS/MEng/PhD Programs in Engineering Science
Thayer School of Engineering
Addendum: An alumnus writes in:
This appointment has been harshly criticized by the Jewish and conservative press and has been giving Dartmouth another black eye (especially among the Jewish community which already views the College as unwelcoming to Jewish students).
As does a parent:
Have been reading your recent DARTBLOG posts with great interest and my blood pressure is rising almost daily. What in the HEAVENS SAKE is going on up there in the Upper Valley? I am incensed with the childish (not to mention ILLEGAL) antics of the Dartmouth Legal TEAM to influence the outcome of today’s IMPORTANT 5/9/17 vote. INTOLERABLE! What in the world are they suggesting when they threaten students who might wish to vote? Repercussions??? Are you f…ing kidding me! Is this Berkeley? I’m steaming over the anticipated FV (Future Value) of this elite Dartmouth degree for which we have paid well in excess of $240K over the past four years.
Also, why cannot Hanlon or even a single member of the Board of Trustees take the time to respond to the recent correspondence from Professor Gustman? Any corporation would toss senior management out on their collective ear, for similar behavior, in today’s business world. Best of Luck to the College on the Long Range Capital Raise. I’m shocked by what I am reading and hearing!
And a member of the faculty:
Note among other things the last paragraph: instead of thanking his critics for raising important points and contributing to an meaningful debate and helping him change his mind (about boycotts), he thanks his supporters. Is he also keeping track of those who did not support him? Will they be punished? Chilling.
Also a confusing statement, as Alan Gustman has pointed out. Did Duthu change his mind? Does he think one thing as a “private citizen” and another as a powerful dean? Or does he continue to believe in boycotting Israeli academic institutions, but is willing to betray his convictions for the sake of ascending to a powerful office? Hard to know what’s going on here.
Posted on May 15, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Turning Point USA in the News
The Dartmouth chapter of Turning Point USA will present another speaker this week, Joe Cohn, the Legislative and Policy Director at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE):
FIRE dropped the College’s free speech rating from Green Light to Yellow Light eighteen months ago.
Turning Point USA itself has been in the news in recent weeks after reports that the national organization had been financing the election efforts of its campus supporters in student government campaigns.
Posted on May 14, 2017 11:00 PM. Permalink
Chief Giaccone’s Twilight
Even though the forecast is for a sunny 85° on Wednesday, former Hanover Police Chief Nick Giaccone’s grandchildren were able to make a snowman today with snow that fell last night in Grantham. The Chief has had health problems in recent years, and he is currently at the Genesis facility on Old Etna Road in Lebanon. Despite his immobility, he is full of ideas, and always willing to entertain a disagreement. As I wrote a while back upon the occasion of his retirement, he is a straight-up guy. Go pay him a visit.
Posted on May 14, 2017 6:15 PM. Permalink
Summer Sounds Its Call
Refreshing swims in my favorite Norwich pool cannot be too far away now:
A quick inspection reveals that the stone dam there needs plenty of work.
Posted on May 14, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Political Seuss on the Loose
Though The D’s Julia O’Sullivan takes issue with the racist portion of Dr. Seuss’ opus, she pays virtually no attention to the 400 politically enlightened cartoons that Ted Geisel ‘25 produced between 1941-43 as the chief editorial cartoonist for New York newspaper PM. All of Geisel’s political cartoons are available at a website run by UC San Diego called Dr. Seuss Went to War:
The Dr. Seuss Collection in the Mandeville Special Collections Library at the University of California, San Diego, contains the original drawings and/or newspaper clippings of all of these cartoons. This website makes these cartoons available to all internet users. The cartoons have been scanned from the original newspaper clippings in the UCSD collection.
A long way from The Cat in the Hat, no?
Addendum: This spring Geisel’s wartime cartoons were displayed at an exhibit at South Piedmont Community College.
Addendum: Geisel’s close ties with UCSD derive from his home’s proximity to the university’s campus. Geisel has a wonderful house on a 6.5-acre lot atop Mt. Soledad overlooking La Jolla.
Posted on May 13, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
How a School Earns a Reputation
Addendum: Not everyone sees things the same way:
Posted on May 12, 2017 3:39 PM. Permalink
Article 9: The College Pulse
After the unexpected result of Tuesday’s voting on Article 9, and yesterday’s informed speculation about why students voted as they did — particularly the students who voted “no” — Dartblog commissioned a poll from College Pulse, the student survey start-up that promises to bring rapidly conducted surveys to the educational and other markets at very competitive prices. College Pulse sent out a survey about Article 9 to 1,100 randomized students during the afternoon of May 10th; 334 students responded by 7pm on May 11, an excellent 30% response rate. Here are the results — with a credibility interval of 4.3%.
Of the 4,234 students on campus, College Pulse estimates that 44% voted: that’s 1,860 student voters:
The 44% figure can be broken down into 32% of all students voting for Article 9 (1,352 students) and a surprising 12% who voted against it (507 students):
Looking at the entire student body, while fraternity men strongly supported Article 9, a majority of sorority women somewhat or strongly opposed it:
As might have been expected, among student who voted, fraternity brothers supported Article 9 by a margin of over 10:1. However, 36.36% of sorority women and 29.27% of unaffiliated students (including freshmen) voted against it:
I’ll have the raw numbers of how the various groups voted soon.
But we can see how in a vote where the final tally was 1,993 to 1,471 in favor of the “no” side, 507 “no” votes by Dartmouth students made all the difference in the world. Had they stayed home, the result would have been too close to call; and had they voted for the “yes” side with most of the Greeks, the result would have been inverted (with ensuing litigation on the constitutionality of a Town statute that allows a private landowner to demand a super-majority).
Addendum: The folks at Campus Pulse sent out the same survey to a different 1,100 students using the Qualtrics service that the College employs (at great expense). The response rate was only 3%.
Posted on May 12, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Just Where Is Heather Lindkvist?
The following message was delivered, if you can believe it, by snail mail to my local business:
Please do some sleuthing into where Heather Lindkvist went. I’ve heard a few different versions 1) she’s on a month health related leave and 2) she’s been put on probation. Not sure which is true. If you look at “Shit Dartmouth Admin and Faculty say” on facebook, that might shed some light? Those are the only public things I’ve heard, minus hundreds of rumors from students. She’s been getting away with intimidating and threatening victims of sexual violence for a few years now. I hope now that she’s possibly gone people can start to come forward with their stories. Everyone is terrified to speak up. It reeks.
Anyone have anything to say about Dartmouth’s Title IX Coordinator? She’s been at the College since the summer of 2014, and her name still appears in the DND lookup.
Posted on May 11, 2017 10:29 PM. Permalink
Article 9: What Happened?
A particularly perspicacious student and observer of the Dartmouth scene writes in with commentary about Tuesday’s vote:
From reading your stories, I think it seems like you’re a bit surprised there was substantial student opposition to Article 9 (which I voted for). I’m sure somehow has reached out already, but I thought I’d offer an interpretation of the different sorts of student opposition.
• People who are opposed to the Greek system generally naturally opposed the article. That’s 10-15 percent of the student body, maybe a bit more.
• There are many people who think that helping “bad apples” makes the entire Greek system appear more suspect. I heard a comparison from a few people to sexual assault: in essence, they said that backing up SAE and AD was like a Greek house supporting its members even while knowing they were sexually assaulting women. People say that you can’t claim that “not everyone is like that” when you support the ones who are.
• Many sororities opposed it. Sororities (and Alpha Chi and Heorot) don’t own their own houses, so they fear that the College, if this passed, might derecognize more houses and if that came about, their houses would be lost. Article 9 only offers protection to those houses that own their own property — and that group becomes even smaller when you consider some houses have more complicated relationships with loans and other items with the College. There was a sense for many that this would antagonize the administration and offer no relief to about half of houses.
• There are also many, many people who believe that an off-campus Greek house will become a hotbed of sexual assault and hazing due to lack of supervision.
• Lastly, some people seemed very upset about the amount of money and effort put into campaigning for this. They felt that fraternities should be more vocal on issues like BLM or social justice than on keeping their houses. This gained a ton of social media traction.
Addendum: This missive was penned by a member of a co-ed house to the house’s members. (First they came for the…)
…Or we could just not get derecognized. Seriously, derecognition is a last resort for the college, and there absolutely need to be consequences in place for fraternities that fuck up badly enough to end up there.
Oli, I totally get where you’re coming from in that a) the student housing situation in Hanover is utter garbage and b) a viable or reasonable option to legally protect Pan would be lovely. But as I understand it, this article was drafted by alumni who don’t live in Hanover, don’t pay town taxes, and just want to preserve their fantasy of a boys’ club that’s allowed to literally brand their pledges or whatever. It’s fundamentally a move to allow SAE and AD to continue to exist, and like the dude in the Valley News said, the thought of how other frats might act were there no penalty for derecognition really makes me nervous. Imo, non-college-owned houses still need to be subject to college rules.
There would also be a significant financial impact on the Town of Hanover, which in the absence of college supervision would have to assume responsibility of all the health & safety inspections and most if not all of the policing these residences require. Aside from the few asshole landlords in town, I really don’t see a need for Hanover taxpayers to bear the financial burden of college debauchery — and eventually the town would likely levy a fine on these houses (including ours) to offset the extra costs. Plus, as annoying as S&S might be, I doubt we’d want to be in a situation where we’re dealing with HPo by default.
I don’t think the Greek system is going anywhere, at least not for a long time, and as long as we don’t majorly fuck up and get derecognized, we’ll be fine. But there’s obviously lots to think about. Full disclosure that I’m still looking into all of this myself, and I’ve never been a hausmyn so I don’t know the extent to which the college facilitates stuff like safety inspections, but I’d really encourage everyone to do their own research using resources OTHER than article9.org (and, once you’ve done so, show up to vote regardless of which way you decide to vote! yay democracy) [Emphasis added]
Addendum: Taking their eye off the ball, some students dispersed their efforts by complaining about past behavior:
Posted on May 11, 2017 4:00 AM. Permalink
Et Tu, Duthu?
Tonight’s quiz: do headlines like this help or hurt our admissions efforts among Jewish students; and help or hurt fundraising efforts for Phil’s capital campaign?
Click here for the full story.
Addendum: Shortly after I put up the above post, an alumnus wrote in to alert me to the same story:
Thanks for your continued coverage of the Duthu fiasco. Just when you think the administration can’t get worse …Dartmouth Announces Linda Sarsour Lecture, Days After College Refused to Co-Sponsor Event Featuring IDF Vet.
Do Hanlon and the trustees think their capital campaign will be even more successful without Jewish and Fraternity alumni?
Posted on May 10, 2017 10:07 PM. Permalink
Article 9 Defeated: Yes: 1471; No: 1993
In an historic result that can only be considered a plebiscite on the fraternity system, Article 9 went down to defeat yesterday by a significant margin: 1471 (42.5%) students and townspeople voted in favor of the article and 1993 (57.5%) voted against it. The tally was only finalized at 2:45am:
The total turnout of 3,464 was unprecedented (usual Town Meeting turnout is in the 1,000 voter range), and a fair analysis of the voting can only lead to the conclusion that a significant portion of student voters — perhaps a third or even more? — voted against the article. And the voters knew what they were doing: all of the other strongly contested articles were approved with between 2199-2625 “yes” votes; Article 9 was the only one where “no” votes predominated.
The vote was a surprise to almost everyone. Several Selectboard members, having witnessed waves of students disembarking from buses that brought them from Webster Avenue, expressed to me that they felt sure that the article would pass with a huge majority. Only one bystander of my acquaintance — a Harvard alumnus, no less — offered the opinion that AD and SAE were considered to be outliers in the fraternity system, and that they were looked down upon for their antics by many students.
Options open to AD and SAE now appear highly restricted. Use of their houses has been limited by town ordinance — supported also by court interpretation in the case of AD — to residence by no more than three unrelated people. Through rumors suggest that the two derecognized houses have continued to pledge new members, without a physical plant of their own, the attractiveness of the fraternities is diminished.
The question is now open as to whether the Town of Hanover will begin enforcing its residency ordinance against the various private properties around the town that have been taken over by students — of which there are a goodly number that hold loud parties.
Posted on May 10, 2017 4:36 AM. Permalink