Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Helman Admits Misleading AD | Home | Did the College Hide AD Evidence? »

Non-faculty Staffing: +63 People In 2016

Let’s take a break from tales of declining application numbers, the hiring of experientially and morally unqualified deans, the firing of dedicated faculty members, and the administration’s active deception of fraternity leaders, and check in on the College’s backbeat: the ever-growing bureaucracy. In 2016 the College added 63 people to the ranks of the non-faculty staff (outside of Geisel):

Non-Faculty Staffing 2014-2016.jpg

As you can see, the administration actually does know how to cut out waste: in the depths of the financial crisis in 2009 and 2010, Jim Wright attempted to clear the decks for an incoming Jim Kim. A total of 345 people were removed from the payroll (though about 75 of those were employees of the Hanover Inn, who were given to the Inn’s private operator). Still, for people who think that our bloat is caused by federal regulation, etc., we were able to cut staff significantly once we had the fear of god (and a declining endowment) in us.

Then Jim Kim showed up, and he spoke endlessly about his desire to cut costs. Of course, to paraphrase Ralph Waldo Emerson, the louder he talked of his budget cuts, the faster he hired more bureaucrats. Under Kim, total spending increased each year, and look at the increase in headcount in 2011 and 2012 above.

Each hire represents a great deal of money — fungible dough that could be used to push faculty salaries back into the the top tier of institutions of higher education. The money could also go to hiring new faculty members so that students enjoy smaller classes, and the world benefits from research conducted by the College’s professors. How did the size of the non-Geisel faculty vary in the same 2004-2016 time period?

Faculty Growth 2004-2016 Ex Geisel.jpg

Doesn’t look too bad, does it? Not unless you focus less on the visuals and more on the x-axis. Last year the faculty grew by only six people, and the year before that not at all. Compare that growth to the two-year increase in the non-Geisel staff: 91 new staffers.

Let’s step back and look at the administration’s performance from 2011-2016, what we might call the Kim/Folt/Hanlon era. Total headcount growth of faculty and staff compared:

Headcount Growth Faculty and Staff 2011-2016.jpg

That’s an additional 49 faculty members, and an extra 386 staffers. Oh, joy.

Even in percentage terms, the growth is highly disproportionate:

Percentage Growth Faculty and Staff 2011-2016.jpg

For every new faculty member that we hire, we add 2.3 staffers.

We’re on a road to nowhere with Phil and Carolyn in the lead (aided and abetted by the know-nothing Trustees). Will nobody do anything about this mess?

Addendum: The above figures come from the most excellent Dartmouth FactBook.


Featured posts

  • August 14, 2013
    Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
    History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
  • June 25, 2013
    Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
    Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at should be presumed copyright 2004-2018 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.




May 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31