Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Dordogne Diary: The Sarlat Gherkin | Home | BREAKING: Shall We Call Inge-Lise Ameer the IDC? »

Bloat: The Government’s Fault?

Arthur Kirk.jpgArthur Kirk, the President of Saint Leo University (located in Saint Leo, Florida) has taken to the pages of the Chronicle of Higher Education to point out the extensive burden placed on college costs by the federal government’s various obligations:

…In recent years at Saint Leo University, we have added positions in risk management, internal audit (two), legal compliance, financial-aid regulatory compliance, human resources, accounting, security and safety, athletic training, athletic compliance, and university-accreditation compliance. In every one of these instances, we are generally responding directly or indirectly to federal regulatory mandates, legal trends, insurers’ expectations, accreditors’ requirements, and so on…

Much, but certainly not all, of the much-maligned “administrative bloat” is driven by external forces, societal demands, and regulations from the federal government, the states, the NCAA, accreditors, and insurers. In addition to state and local laws, higher-education institutions are required to comply with federal laws too numerous to count. The website of the Higher Education Compliance Alliance lists many of them, but there are others.

A simple count does not reflect the complexities institutions face, as the Higher Education Act alone is 900 pages long. Higher education is regulated by every cabinet-level department and numerous subagencies. One small private college documented that 106 employees logged 7,200 hours completing federal compliance forms. Some regulations were promulgated to call us to account for why our tuition costs so much…

Regrettably President Kirk does not detail — as a good consultant would do — the proportional and the total number of people at his institution who are only in their jobs because of government requirements. If we knew just how many bureaucrats were in place at Saint Leo’s due to the government, and how many were there because Kirk believes that the are needed to serve students, his argument would have a great deal more force.

That said, higher education is, in fact, an area of the economy that is highly regulated, and Dartmouth certainly has its share of government-mandated staff members. But let’s put things in some perspective. Government regulation is accretive; every year statutes and regulations oblige schools to add people. As a result, one would expect that the number of staffers would increase each year. That’s not the case in Hanover. At the College, we are still fighting the enormous bloat that occurred in the first years of Jim Wright’s mismanaged administration. Between 1999 and 2005, Wright added 934 non-faculty employees to the College’s staff, an increase of 38.8% during a period when undergrad enrollments and faculty numbers hardly changed. Few of these people were hired to fulfill government requirements:

Factbook Staff 1999-2011a.jpg

As you can see, the numbers tapered off for a while at the start of the Kim administration (in part because 75-80 employees of the Hanover Inn shifted to the private sector), but they soon resumed their relentless rise. In the last Kim budget, the College added 153 employees, and during Carol Folt’s year as IP, another 115 people joined the payroll. Today’s non-faculty headcount is the highest that it has ever been: 3,443 non-faculty employees. Did the 268 people hired in the last two years come to Hanover due to government mandates? I’d sure like the administration to explain what they are doing all day.


Featured posts

  • August 14, 2013
    Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
    History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
  • June 25, 2013
    Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
    Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at should be presumed copyright 2004-2018 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.




May 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31