Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« The Thoughts of Chairman Steve | Home | Godspeed Paul Danos »


Parker Gilbert: The Medical Evidence

Trial Commentary: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7.

Amelia Acosta ‘15 has taken over reportorial duties for The D, and she has continued the careful work begun last week by Marina Shkuratov ‘15. The D’s account of Monday’s trial proceedings is here, and the Valley News’ shorter summary is here.

Three people testified yesterday: Elizabeth B. Morse, a certified sexual assault nurse examiner who works for both Dartmouth College Health Services and at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Susan Faith, a criminalist from the New Hampshire State Police forensic lab; and Alexandra Jarvis ‘16, a friend of the complainant.

The latter two witnesses seemed to add little or nothing to the proceeding. Faith’s analyses of the medical samples collected during the complainant’s examination on the day after the interaction with Gilbert were inconclusive; no evidence linked to Gilbert was found. Jarvis testified to the complainant’s state of mind, and once again, statements made to Hanover Chief of Police Frank Moran were read out by the defense with the goal of illustrating contradictions between in-court testimony and comments previously made.

Elizabeth Morse’s time on the stand involved a lengthy description of her examination protocols, the results of her examinations themselves, and her notes about the complainant’s comments made at the time of the examination.

The complainant was quoted as saying that she was not intoxicated during the evening in question: she had “had a little bit to drink” but “was lucid.” As a result, no tests for alcohol or drugs were conducted. Notes taken during the examination had the complainant observe that the defendant had used a single derogatory epithet with her, in contrast to the stream of ugly language about which she had testified on the stand last week.

Nurse Morse quoted the complainant as not being in pain, except during invasive parts of the examination. She did have multiple bruises, whose origins were not commented about. Morse also admitted that it had been “a mistake” under the SANE protocols not to take protein samples from under the complainant’s finger nails.

The prosecution will now conclude the presentation of its evidence. The defense will present its own evidence. It is unlikely that Gilbert himself will take the stand; he would have nothing to gain by recounting the night’s events, and he could come across in a negative light to the jury.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2014 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

March 2014
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

Search

Archives

Links