Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« 10%/10%/10% Just Isn’t Possible | Home | Another Ugly Incident »


Does Chicago Have a Problem?

The only other major school to suffer a significant drop in total applications this year that has come to our attention is the University of Chicago (-9.5%). Alert readers have written in to ask why.

First of all, let’s compare the recent application figures for Dartmouth and Chicago:

Chicago Dartmouth Totals Apps Comp.jpg

Dartmouth’s 14% decline in applications this year dropped the College back to where it was in 2010 (Class of 2014); in contrast, Chicago’s 9.5% decline still had it 42% above the number of applications for the Class of 2014.

In addition, early decision applications at Dartmouth have varied only marginally over the past six years; whereas early action applications at Chicago continued their unbroken, six-year run of increases this year (almost tripling in this time period):

Chicago Dartmouth Early Applicants.jpg

Explanation? The folks in Chicago talked about glitches in the Common App this past fall as having hurt their total application numbers. Like Dartmouth, they delayed closing the application period as a result. That rationale is nonsense, of course. There is no reason why the Common App’s problems affected Chicago to this extent, when they did not affect other schools, including Illinois schools like Northwestern.

The more likely reason is simply that the Chicago numbers saw a momentary pullback after a fantastic rise, which people in the Windy City attribute to the hiring in 2010 of superstar admissions director Jim Nondorf and to his energetic efforts to market the university. None of the articles in the Maroon cited scandals or policy changes in Hyde Park.

In contrast Dartmouth’s admissions charts look different: they point to a school that has been dead in the water for a while now, beset by problems that are particular to it.

Addendum: The evolution of the total number of applications received by Chicago and Dartmouth is striking. Chicago has 5,607 undergrads and Dartmouth has 4,276 — a difference of 31%. Chicago received 43% more applications last year than Dartmouth (27,499 vs. 19,235). More interestingly, looking at the above charts, it appears that Chicago and Dartmouth received about the same number of applications five years ago (even though Chicago had many more students then, too), but since that time Chicago has pulled ahead of the College. Like almost everything else in Hanover, our admissions department needs some shaking up.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2014 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

March 2014
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

Search

Archives

Links