Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
Moving Dartmouth Forward: The D-Plan
The above headline was the title of the administration’s open forum, but the true topic of the day was Phil’s desire to balance out enrollments in each term, so that continuous dorm living would again be possible. You can watch if you wish, but do so only if you want to see unfocused, rambling remarks from an audience that had been left unclear about the goal of the proceedings:
A great many comments were made about the virtues/disadvantages of the quarter system and the summer term, and so on, but those topics are not up for discussion as Phil looks at reshaping College life. However, a number of points should be made about the main topic of balancing enrollments.
Longtime readers know that continuous dorm living has been a theme at this site for years: I first wrote about the subject in The D in 2004 (here is the article; regrettably the piece does not come up on The D’s klunky website). Phil’s goal here is an admirable one. However, not only should dorm continuity be restored, but a return to mixed-class dorms over all four years — and the abolition of freshmen-only dorms — should be a priority, too. The move away from mixed dorms took place in the mid-1990’s, despite the fact that 65% of students opposed the change for many reasons.
To their credit, many speakers at the forum noted that the gutting of community life in the dorms (both by ending mixed dorms and dorm continuity) has led to the increased importance of the Greek system — as lovely an example of unintended consequences as there is to be found in the land (one that was utterly predictable at the time). As we noted yesterday, the Greek system has never had a higher percentage of students in it than today (fraternity enrollment is up 23.3% in the last decade, and sorority enrollment is up 37.4%), despite endless efforts by successive administrations to develop “social alternatives.”
Regrettably, two vital ideas for balancing term enrollments were not evoked in the discussion on Monday:
● For many years after the implementation of the D-Plan, fraternity rush took place in the winter term. As a result of this schedule, many brothers stayed on campus at a time when they might not have been present. Re-scheduling rush for the winter would go a long way towards balancing enrollments.
● As we have suggested in the past, a requirement for graduation should be participation in a Dartmouth-faculty-led off-campus program. By making an LSA/FSP mandatory, we would provide our students with outstanding, small-group education in the classroom; we’d give them experiential learning outside the classroom; and we could get them out of Hanover during the terms when we would prefer that they not be in town. Student participation in the College’s off-campus programs has been declining in recent years as undergraduates take courses overseas with cheaper schools (Portland State, I’m thinking of you). With added participation from the faculty, we could re-build this traditional Dartmouth strength.
How to implement these changes? Here’s a thought. Offer the frats the option of having kegs and taps back in the houses (there are good reasons for allowing this anyways) in exchange for accepting winter rush; and tell the faculty that if they ramp up their foreign program participation, they’ll get priority parking in the center of campus (there are excellent reasons for this, too).
Addendum: For at least a decade or two after the implementation of the D-Plan in 1972, on-campus enrollments remained between 3200-3400 each term, and there was no housing crunch. And remember, this was before the construction of the East Wheelock Cluster, the Maynard Street dorms and the Fahey dorm on Tuck Mall.
Then things started to go south. Why? Someone should analyze the changes. Perhaps the faculty could help the College’s army of administrators with their social science skills. The Office of Institutional Research has detailed enrollment records going back many years. As the number of students on campus climbed from the previously manageable level to today’s 4,000+ figure (virtually everyone), a campus historian will be able to note inflection points as policy changes drove attendance to where it is today.
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…