Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
D’Souza Accused of Illegal Contributions
Belated Addendum: The blogosphere is all atwitter with accusations that D’Souza was singled out for prosecution.
Dinest D’Souza ‘83, who will be debating Bill Ayers at the College on January 30, has been indicted by United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and by the FBI of “violating the federal campaign finance laws by making illegal contributions to a United States Senate campaign in the names of others and causing false statements to be made to the Federal Election Commission in connection with those contributions.” NBC has the story:
Conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza was indicted in federal court on Thursday on allegations he made illegal contributions to a U.S. Senate campaign in New York in 2012.
D’Souza — a former president of King’s College in New York, and co-director of the controversial documentary “2016: Obama’s America” — is accused of illegally directing associates to make contributions to a Senate campaign committee that totaled $20,000. He then reimbursed those individuals for the contributions, prosecutors say.
Though the candidate isn’t identified in the indictment, NBC News has confirmed that it is Republican Wendy Long [Class of ‘82], who lost the Senate bid in a landslide to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [Class of ‘88].
And the Federal Election Commission website lists only one federal candidate to whom D’Souza has contributed: Long.
D’Souza campaigned in 2012 on behalf of Long, a lawyer who graduated from Dartmouth College a year before D’Souza did.
In response to the charges, D’Souza, via high-profile attorney Benjamin Branfman, released a statement saying:
“It is important to note that the indictment does not allege a corrupt relationship between Mr. D’Souza and the candidate. There was never a corrupt agreement of any kind, nor was there any request made that the candidate take any action or refrain from taking any action as a candidate, or as a US Senator, if her political campaign were to have been successful.”
The statement continued, “Simply put, there was no “quid pro quo” in this case, nor was there even any knowledge by the candidate that Campaign Finance Rules may have been violated. Mr. D’Souza did not act with any corrupt or criminal intent whatsoever. He and the candidate have been friends since their college days, and at worst, this was an act of misguided friendship by D’Souza.”
The charge carries a maximum of two years in prison, according to a news release from the U.S Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara.
D’Souza is also charged with one count of causing false statements to be made the Federal Election Commission in connection with the campaign contributions. If convicted, that charge carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.
“As we have long said, this Office and the FBI take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process,” Bharara said in a statement. ” If, as alleged, the defendant directed others to make contributions to a Senate campaign and reimbursed them, that is a serious violation of federal campaign finance laws.”
The prosecutor said the indictment is the result of a routine review by the FBI of campaign filings with the FEC .
Addendum. The NYT reports on the story.
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…