A Dartblog technical alert
Due to unexpected changes in our hosting environment, Dartblog will have little to no updates for up to one week from 7/6/15. We'll be back. Promise. Apologies.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
To date we’ve looked in some detail at spending at Dartmouth and Brown, and we’ve seen in the past that Brown’s tuition is lower than Dartmouth’s and that Brown is more forthcoming with financial aid. Now it’s time to look at where the money comes from.
In addition to tuition revenues and research grants, the schools’ most substantial income comes from payouts from the endowment and annual gifts from alumni and other donors.
In 2013, Brown drew out $125,858,000 from its endowment (4.72% of its $2.67 billion endowment) to fund operations, and its generous alumni contributed $70,505,000 to the school, for total receipts in these categories of $196,363,000.
Dartmouth drew $183,816,000 from its endowment (5.25% of $3.48 billion) to fund operations, and its even-more-generous-though-less-numerous alumni contributed $90,332,000 to the College, for a total of $274,148,000.
Comparing those two figures, Dartmouth used $77,785,000 more income for its annual operations from its endowment and gifts than Brown, even though Brown has 36% more students than Dartmouth.
On a per student basis, Brown’s 8,454 students were subsidized by endowment distributions and giving to the tune of $23,227 each; Dartmouth’s 6,144 students were supported by $44,620 each. In short, Dartmouth’s administration had $21,393 more per student to work with than did Brown’s leaders.
Yet, to repeat, tuition and financial aid at Brown are more generous than at the College. One would think that the administration at Dartmouth would use some of this treasure to support students in Hanover. But, no. Successive Presidents, especially Jim Wright, had other priorities. Why support Dartmouth students and faculty when there is a bloated bureaucracy to be fed?
Will Phil do anything about this sad state of affairs?
Addendum: The Wall Street Journal ran a piece the other day on the increasing anger at state schools on the part of students whose tuition more than covers the entire cost of their education — with the excess going to fund financial aid for other students. Such “set-asides” do not occur at Dartmouth. As we saw recently, the annual cost of a year at the College is well over $100,000/year, far in excess of the $60,201 cost of tuition, room and board, and fees. The difference is provided by the endowment and alumni giving, as we saw above.
Addendum: An alumnus, who recalls for me that money is fungible, writes in with an admonition concerning the above addendum:
I admit that I am not sure whether your addendum that Dartmouth imposes no set-asides because the average cost per student exceeds tuition, room, and board was a test, a joke, or a lapse in your usual financial acuity.
But whatever the excuse, yes, Dartmouth definitely compels the middle and upper-class students to subsidize the rest. And it costs them a lot.
The College says that it’s average grant is about $42,000. About half the students get grants, meaning about half do not. Last time I looked, about half of this financial aid comes from funds restricted to this purpose.
So that means each year, the half of the student body not getting a grant is paying for the half of the grants (about $21,000 each) not paid from the restricted endowment. That’s the set-aside. Worse, every time tuition, room, or board goes up, this subsidy must go up because those who could not afford to pay before the price increase still can’t afford to pay more (and, in fact, a large increase will create more grant receivers).
I don’t deny that for the hedge fund guys and the private equity guys who are sitting on hundreds of millions or billions of net worth, this $21,000 a year is a pittance. It’s the middle class family or student who gets the sucker punch from this because they have to borrow this extra money.
PS: I do appreciate that having less wealthy students in the student body adds immensely to the educational experience for everyone. Perhaps that’s worth a $21,000/year surtax. Perhaps.
PPS: I also realize someone can play shell games here, as they often do, and claim that it’s the income from the unrestricted endowment or the unrestricted alumni fund. If that delusion makes them feel better, so be it.
The only argument that one could advance in the face of the notion that any student who pays more is always subsidizing any student who pays less is that the Dartmouth College Fund, to which almost half of all alumni contribute, has as its stated goal the financial aid of needy students — and perhaps such monies would not be given by alumni if they were not intended to this end. That said, last year at the College, financial aid amounted to $124,223,000, a figure well in excess of the amount of money given by alumni: $90,332,000. Touché.
August 14, 2013
Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
June 25, 2013
Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…