Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« “What’s So Great About America?” | Home | The Knives Come Out for Carol »

Paying Fair Wages (Part 1/2)

The space that housed the Village Green diner when I was a student has long been the home of the Dirt Cowboy Café, a crowded, friendly coffee house whose owner rightly prides himself on his non-corporate management. The Café has even taken to advertising that it pays a fairer wage than the Starbucks location just down Main Street.

According to the below banner, the Dirt Cowboy pays $12/hour (with no benefits or paid vacation, according to the staff), and Starbucks pays only about $9.25/hour. Actually, Starbucks’ employees say that it pays just under $9.00/hour, but they accrue several weeks of paid vacation each year, and for about a $70/paycheck contribution, they can buy full medical coverage. This latter amount is probably about one third of the health insurance’s actual cost, so Starbucks contributes about $125/paycheck to insurance for those employees who want it.

That latter amount brings the the compensation at the two establishments into rough equivalency, and the total at each place would seem to define the upper level of the Hanover wage scale for work that requires little or no training or education (though employees do need to be neat and personable for these jobs):

DC Wages.jpg

According to the Congressional Budget Office’s wage tables, a couple both employed at the Dirt Cowboy or at Starbucks would find themselves in the middle quintile of American families; that is, they would earn less than about 40% of American families and more than about 40% of American families. No too bad for unskilled work requiring no education or formal skills.

But are these wages “fair” in the parlance of people believing in fair/living wages, as opposed to compensation set by the market. Let’s look at the Penn State Poverty in America project’s Fair Wage Calculator for Hanover:

Living Wage Calculator.jpg

The current legal minimum wage is $7.25/hour, so neither the Dirt Cowboy nor Starbuck’s are breaking the law. As far as a living wage goes, the Living Wage Calculator says that a single individual can live on $9.20/hour, so, again, both places are paying an acceptable wage to a single person by any standard. However, neither establishment is paying wages sufficient to support an adult with one or more children.

But if a couple is working in Hanover serving coffee, their combined income from Starbucks and Dirt Cowboy can support them and two to three children according to the Living Wage Calculator.

Tomorrow we’ll see how fair wages are at Dartmouth, particularly at the Class of ‘53 Commons Dining Hall, which is about 250 feet from the Dirt Cowboy and 500 feet from Starbucks.


Featured posts

  • August 14, 2013
    Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
    History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
  • June 25, 2013
    Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
    Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at should be presumed copyright 2004-2018 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.




April 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30