Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« A Brownian Cost Commotion | Home | Endowment: Is It Worth the Effort? »


Spending Per Student

Yesterday we saw how Dartmouth spends $105,491,000 more each year than Brown University, even though Brown has 36% more students than the College. Brown cost only $729,782,000 to run in 2013 vs. $835,273,000 for Dartmouth.

Let’s work that out on a per-student basis. Of course, to do so, we’ll need to take out sponsored research, which can skew these expense numbers. And while we are at it, let’s compare Dartmouth and Brown with several other predominantly undergraduate schools in New England:

Dartmouth Per Student Cost Comp.jpg

Yikes! The cost per student at Dartmouth is 35.38% higher than at plushy Williams, and it is 56.73% higher than at Brown. After that, the comparison gets really ugly: 76.82% higher than at Tufts; 139.01% higher than at Boston College; and $142.15% higher than at Brandeis.

Here’s a suggestion for Phil’s management team: get down to these schools, or better yet, hire some rigorous consultants, and obtain the following information:

● How many people each school has working in its various functional areas;

● What they are paid for their various bureaucratic jobs; and,

● The value of the benefits that they receive in addition to their wages.

Then, as my first-grade English teacher used to say: compare and contrast with the Dartmouth bureaucracy.

After that, act. Forcefully. If we could just get our per-student cost down to Brown’s level (but keep our current level of sponsored research), we would cut $236,623,634 from the current budget. Not an unachievable target, especially given that the cost of doing business and living in Providence is higher than it is in Hanover.

But that level of cost reduction is not the real goal. The $236,623,634 figure is just a preliminary indication of how much fat there is in the College’s budget. Rather than cutting all this money, Phil could re-allocate about half of that amount to reducing the draw on the endowment, and use the other half to dramatically trim the cost of tuition, room and board, and fees; re-build embarrassingly decrepit dorms like the Choates; and hire more faculty members in order to make a Dartmouth education the finest in the land. My word, you could almost say that this was the core of a strategic plan.

Addendum: The above is textbook Bain & Company analysis, the kind we provided to huge, bloated companies that were fighting for their lives. Phil should start getting our expenses into line before we get to that point.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2014 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

January 2014
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

Search

Archives

Links