Dartmouth's Daily Blog
News, commentary, criticism and praise for the College on the Hill, enlivened with history, culture and travel when we feel so moved.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
As Phil Hanlon noted in his message announcing the withdrawal of Malawian Bishop James Tengatenga’s Tucker Foundation appointment, the Bishop came to Hanover to talk with Phil. When I asked Bishop Tengatenga about his visit and his reaction to the College’s decision, he sent me the following response:
I find it curious that President Hanlon did not invite students to meet with Bishop Tengatenga in the course of his visit. Perhaps several face-to-face meetings would have shown students another side of the man. Malawi to Hanover is a long way to come for just one meeting in Parkhurst.
Addendum: A senior member of the faculty writes in with an observation:
Your comment about President Hanlon’s handling of the Tengatenga matter [“I find it curious that President Hanlon did not invite students to meet with Bishop Tengatenga in the course of his visit. Perhaps several face-to-face meetings would have shown students another side of the man. Malawi to Hanover is a long way to come for just one meeting in Parkhurst.”] seems really odd.
This was not a student decision. That’s how Jim Kim would have handled it: bring in a group of students, let the candidate charm them, and then go back to business as usual. A good way of avoiding a hard decision while appearing student-friendly. If the students went the other way, blame the decision on them.
This decision had to be made by a knowledgeable professional with years of administrative experience. After much consultation, including a personal meeting with the Bishop, it had to be made alone by one person. Phil Hanlon got this just right. Don’t confuse the issue.
P.S. Perhaps the Bishop should sit down with his Bible:
“But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also” (Mt 5:39).
Addendum: As does an alumnus who closely follows the affairs of the College:
You say, “I find it curious that President Hanlon did not invite students to meet with Bishop Tengatenga in the course of his visit. Perhaps several face-to-face meetings would have shown students another side of the man. Malawi to Hanover is a long way to come for just one meeting in Parkhurst.”
Not so sure about that. Phil had to be “the decider” here, and he had done his homework. Meeting in-person was the culmination, but the issue for the present was in fact the past, and no popular judgement of a convenience sample of August-in-Hanover students (new sophomores, presumably) would have changed that. Could have complicated it, certainly, but would not have changed it.
Sure, the fault here was proximately the committee’s. But it was ultimately the Bishop’s. He should have known that his aggressively offensive past public positions needed full disclosure by him in advance; they needed to be part of his own story, and that story could have been compelling. Instead, he plied the committee with environmentalism. And when his past came into view, either he lied or he conceded — implicitly only — that he had lied previously. He did not say anything like the following: “Yes, I was a bishop loyal to the doctrine of my church. But more than loyal. That doctrine was my doctrine. I believed it then. I helped shape it then. But I was wrong to do so. Coming to know this has been an epiphany for me, and it’s an epiphany I must urgently share. Maybe I will do that someday again as an Anglican parish priest in Malawi, but I will do it first as a dean in New Hampshire, in whose Episcopal church I hope soon to receive communion from a courageous and forgiving bishop whom I once vilified.” We heard nothing of the sort.
And then, in his response to your e-mail, Tengatenga played the race card! Against the NAACP. (Hello!)
Well done, Phil. Lots more to do.
I stand corrected.
August 14, 2013
Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
June 25, 2013
Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
- The Dartmouth College Case
- 2007 Trustee Election
- Dartmouth Constitution
- Sunday Morning Sinatra
- The Indian Wars
Subscribe by Email
This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.
All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2018 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.