Dartmouth's Daily Blog
News, commentary, criticism and praise for the College on the Hill, enlivened with history, culture and travel when we feel so moved.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
In an e-mailed statement shared with the media yesterday, Bishop Tengatenga has responded to concerns about his extensive and vocal past opposition to homosexuality, marriage equality and the consecration of gay bishops in the Anglican/Episcopalian church:
I consider all people equal before God regardless of their sexual orientation. Their dignity should be honored and respected and their safety assured. Where the law prescribes rights those rights have to be upheld. Discrimination of any kind is sinful.
As this space had previously reported, Bishop Tengatenga also commented on the seeming dissonance between the Archbishop of Canterbury’s personal views on homosexuality and the supposedly strict teachings of the Church:
“The Anglican Church hasn’t changed, yes we are against homosexuality and [Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan] Williams does not approve of the consecration of gay bishops,” he said. “The church’s position and an individual’s are two different things.”
Regarding the latter comment, The D’s story yesterday leads one to believe that Bishop Tengatenga is referring to a dichotomy between his personal views and his Church’s doctrine; however, that is not at all the meaning of his comments. His actual meaning is that the Archbishop of Canterbury’s tolerant views in no way take away from the anti-gay import of Church law.
But let’s parse Bishop Tengatenga’s more recent statement in response to the growing controversy. First off, we should give him credit for a finely honed sense of language. His comment is craftily crafted: it is designed to play well both with the home crowd in Malawi and at Dartmouth. But he can’t have things both ways. Nowhere in it does Tengatenga refer specifically to the core issues where his views are of concern: homosexuality, marriage equality and the consecration of gay bishops. Instead, his platitudes leave readers, whether they be Malawian homophobes or Dartmouth supporters of gay rights, with plenty of wiggle room to find agreement with him.
Secondly, he leaves space for himself to continue to be anti-gay. While “all people” — presumably including gay people — may be equal before God, the good Bishop does not seem to have any problem with the anti-gay laws in place in many African countries: “Where the law prescribes rights those rights have to be upheld.” That’s not good enough. One may render unto Caesar in Africa, but clerics in America such as Martin Luther King, Jr., have a long and noble tradition of opposing discriminatory laws. The head of the Tucker Foundation should show similar courage.
The College should withdraw Bishop Tengatenga’s job offer forthwith. A mistake has been made. Admit it. Move on.
One last remark: If an American fundamentalist minister with a record of beliefs similar to Bishop Tengatenga’s had applied for the Tucker job, it is fair to say that his application would not have been considered for a nanosecond.
Addendum: The search committee that selected Bishop Tengatenga was headed by German and Comparative Literature Professor Irene Kacandes; it included Tucker Board of Visitors member Ann Beams ‘77, Government Professor Russ Muirhead, Associate Provost for Advancement and Centers Rachel Silver, Associate Professor of Native American Studies Melanie Taylor, and the College’s Director of Residential Education Michael Wooten.
Erratum: The Search Committee also included Dean of Admissions Maria Laskaris ‘84.
Addendum: The College’s press release concerning Bishop Tengatenga’s appointment makes no reference to his controversial views.
August 14, 2013
Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
June 25, 2013
Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
- The Dartmouth College Case
- 2007 Trustee Election
- Dartmouth Constitution
- Sunday Morning Sinatra
- The Indian Wars
Subscribe by Email
This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.
All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2017 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.