Dartblog
Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Hanlon/Nixon to Dartmouth/China | Home | Hanlon Knows Johnson from Michigan »
Here’s a Lie For You
A few months back, this space greeted the incoming 2016’s with a post entitled, Freshmen, There Will Be Lies, wherein we attempted to sensitize the incoming class to the notion that senior members of the administration will distort the truth in order to advance their aims. This idea is hard to swallow for incoming students, filled as they are with a sense that integrity must be omnipresent in leaders of an Ivy League institution. Ha!
Let me give you a recent example. This summer, when most upperclassmen were out of town, Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson introduced serious changes in the enforcement of the rules concerning the serving and consumption by students of alcohol. Among her ideas were three significant ones: random walk-throughs of students social spaces (private and College-owned); heightened enforcement of a ban on punches; and the obligation that only licensed bartenders serve hard alcohol at student events.
I attended Dean Johnson’s presentation of these ideas, at which the good Dean emphasized that these new policies simply aligned the College with rules in place at schools similar to Dartmouth. Of course, she trotted out Jim Kim’s favorite phrase, “best practices.” (This expression was well on its way to becoming a cliché when I was a Bain consultant in the mid-1980’s; today when you hear it, check your wallet.)
The only problem with the Dean’s assertion is that it is not true. The worthy sleuths at the Dartmouth Review have gathered information about alcohol policies at other Ivy schools from students, admissions officers, campus security police, and university websites, which they cogently assembled in the chart reproduced below (from the Review’s October 25th issue). No school has all three of Dean Johnson’s new policies in place, and only one school, Penn, has two out of the three. How’s that again, Charlotte?
In a normal world, when someone tells a lie, there are consequences. Does Dean Johnson believe that the Review’s information is incorrect? If so, she should say as much; if not, she should resign.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…