Dartblog
Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Une Grande Table Parisienne: Lasserre | Home | Folt/Kim: Loving the Big Lie »
Cost Overruns Like the Pentagon
When the College files a building permit with the Town of Hanover, it lists the estimated cost of a project. The cost on the permit is usually close to the figure that the College announces publicly.
But the story doesn’t end there. Invariably the various stakeholders in any Dartmouth building project intervene and chaotically add expensive changes. And often the administration tells contractors to speed up construction for PR reasons. The result is that the final cost of construction balloons out of control.
Fortunately, we can find out the true cost of the College’s follies by looking at the Certificate of Occupancy that the Town issues once construction is finished. Let’s take a look at the swim docks:
● On February 25, 2011, the College announced that the new swim docks would cost $200,000.
● In a building permit application dated May 6, 2011, the cost was estimated at $193,500.
● However, the project’s final Certificate of Occupancy puts the real cost of the project at $270,000 — a 35-36% overrun from the initial estimates. Needless to say, the final cost figure was never announced by the College.
As we have seen regarding the renovation of the Hanover Inn, the management of construction at the College is an expensive mess. The waste of money is unconscionable.
Addendum: Construction projects can come in on time and on budget — as long as professional people closely manage the entire operation. Anyone involved in the construction trade in Hanover knows that this is never the case as regards Dartmouth. In fact, Upper Valley builders regularly amuse themselves by swapping tales of the College’s incompetence.
Addendum: Lest you think that $70,000 is de minimis, it is enough money to pay the annual salary of a brilliant young humanities professor, or two cook’s helpers w/o a high school education at Thayer Dining Hall.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…