Dartblog
Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Another $150 Million of Borrowing | Home | Old But Good News: D Muzzles Staff »
Inside Higher Education Chronicles Trustee Conflicts of Interest
While the Trustees are handing out honorary degrees as if they were party favors, the world of higher education is still talking about Dartmouth’s buddy-buddy investment practices. Inside Higher Education has a detailed story on the subject, including the news that the College will soon file a response with the NH Attorney General’s Office as part of the AG’s ongoing investigation of the Board’s insider investments.
The piece concludes as follows:
Even if the transactions are in colleges’ best interests, and even if each college followed proper reporting procedures each time it engaged in such a transaction, many critics say that’s not sufficient. Investments such as the ones Dartmouth are making create the appearance of impropriety, many argue, and there’s no way to eliminate such questions other than refraining from such transactions.
Richard P. Chait, a faculty member at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Education who studies institutional governance, has said repeatedly that the only way colleges and universities can truly avoid allegations of corruption and mismanagement is to almost always avoid doing business with trustees’ companies.
Beyond the disapprobation expressed in the article, the comment by trustee governance guru Richard Chait is especially noteworthy. Chait has been working with the Dartmouth Board for several years now. However, it is one thing to pay for the services of a top-drawer consultant; it is another thing to listen to him.
Addendum: My, my. Hazing, corruption, a fly-by-night President, building projects so expensive that they shock the conscience. For a Board that places such emphasis on managing Dartmouth’s “brand,” the word-of-mouth advertising that the College is generating these days is not moving us in the right direction. How about a different strategy: recruiting more strong professors; creating exciting interdisciplinary courses, improving student housing arrangements; re-establishing an innovative writing program; organizing smaller classes. In short, do some things that are real.
Addendum: To nobody’s surprise, there was no mention of the IHE article in the Dartmouth in the News newsfeed.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…