Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
Strategic Planning: Stop the Madness
IP-Provost Carol Folt has never had an original idea in her life as a College adminstrator, and there is absolutely no need, especially at this point in time, to have the strategic planning machine further prove that proposition. We’ve written about strategic planning efforts before: how in the academy they are considered to be useless exercises, and how in Hanover their recommendations are promptly forgotten. However, now that we are in the process of choosing a new President, the last thing the administration needs to do is waste time and money developing a plan that will almost certainly prove uncongenial to our new leader. Certainly the Trustees are not about to tell the next President that Interim-President Folt’s strategic plan is all wrapped up, and all the new occupant of Parkhurst has to do is execute Carol’s program. Come on.
Beyond that, there are other fundamental problems with the whole shebang. First of all, is the strategy that will be defined anything more than a vague set of aspirations? Or is it a confirmed set of steps that the College will follow? Will the faculty vote to approve all or part of it? One thing that the leaders of Bain & Company learned in consulting is that recommendations that don’t have serious, ongoing follow-up are are often as not forgotten. To date, there seems to be no indication that the product of all of this committee work will be anything more than a pretty binder that is not binding on anyone.
This point leads to a second observation. If the College’s senior-most and highest achieving faculty members were involved in strategic planning, we’d stand a chance of getting serious ideas that would be acted upon. Is that the case here? Good for you for recognizing a rhetorical question and already knowing the answer.
Of course not. The members of the Faculty Strategic Planning Advisory Committee (F-SPAC for hip insiders) include 17 faculty members (plus Professor Anthony), but only nine are from Arts & Sciences. Of those nine, six are just associate professors. And why is this a problem? For two reasons: the first is that associate professors should be working to establish national reputations in the hope of earning full professorships; they are in the most critical and productive part of their scholarly lives. The second reason is that these professors are vulnerable to the application of pressure from senior administrators (yes, this means you, Carol), and therefore their independence is open to question. A more experienced group of professors — for instance, one that included even a single full professor from the sciences — would do a better job. They are not worried about being promoted.
But the latter arguments are just gilding on the the lily that was my initial point. Let’s stop a flawed process that is stillborn anyways. There are better things to do.
Addendum: Undoubtedly inspired by President Kim’s recent world-wide listening tour, Carol Folt will be in London to talk to the Dartmouth Club on Thursday, May 24. Watch Carol make the most of her time in the sun. Useless expense be damned. After all, we can expect the next President to make the same journey soon enough.
Addendum: A senior member of the faculty comments:
Carol will certainly not let this hobby horse of hers die, and there have been lots and lots of people working on it (all to no effect so far, it seems to me). But it was a doomed enterprise anyway, and the new president will accept the report with “enormous gratitude” and then place it on a shelf with its predecessors. As of yet it has no faculty buy in, and I’m reasonably confident that everyone will soon want to wash their hair of any Kim-Folt reminders.
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…