Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Way to go, Max! | Home | Jim Kim Writes to the Globe »


Dartmouth’s Undying Shame

Dartblog sources have obtained the Undergraduate Judicial Affairs Office charge for Andrew Lohse ‘12 (below), confirming that he will be accused of hazing — information that first appeared in the Boston Globe. We reproduce it here in the belief that the Dartmouth community has a legitimate need to know that the Kim administration has behaved in a morally repugnant fashion.

Despite Dartmouth’s written policy of encouraging students to report hazing violations, and President Kim’s recent plea that students voluntarily approach the administration with details of hazing, the decision to charge Lohse communicates the College’s real intention far more loudly than any of its words: If you come to us with embarrassing allegations about hazing, we will prosecute you. This message makes it hard to believe that there will ever again be a whistleblower at the College.

Lohse’s column in Dartblog and his subsequent piece in The Dartmouth appear to be the sole source of the College’s evidence about him, though perhaps investigators also recorded incriminating information when he initially complained to senior College administrators in November, 2010.

If Dartmouth sincerely wishes to have students report hazing, the College should at the very least extend the spirit of its Good Sam policy to protecting whistleblowers. Regrettably for Lohse, he is only a student and not an employee of a company. Under New Hampshire’s whistleblower statute, a company cannot punish an employee for aiding in an investigation or complaining about inappropriate activity.

Shame on the Kim administration for abusing a student’s good faith and trust.


Cos Lohse1a.jpg

Cos Lohse2a.jpg

Addendum: An Olde Green, who follows campus affairs closely, writes in:

I was especially struck by the College’s selective applications of charges such as”provided alcohol to students under the age of twenty-one…”, and “and/or provided alcoholic beverages to obviously intoxicated individuals.”

These charges could probably be applied to 80% of all students 21 or older, as well as most certainly being brought against every single Greek House (I’ve always wondered why, in fact, NH AG hasn’t done that.

The random and/or self-serving application of any law makes a sham of the law itself, and, from my perspective, is the reason inebriation is the (aided and abetted by the admin) norm at Dartmouth, and the source of the whole hazing issue anyhow. Odd to be using, from my perspective, the cause to produce the ‘cure’.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2014 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

June 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Search

Archives

Links