Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
Is SmartChoice Dumb?
So goes the name of Dartmouth’s new dining plan to be used at the renovated Class of 1953 Commons. Someone in the student body seems to think SmartChoice is a poor choice. Students received the following message this afternoon:
Under DDS’s new “SmartChoice” dining plans, you’re going to have to spend your money this way:
SmartChoice20 for $1658: $7.92 per meal
SmartChoice14 for $1575: $10.36 per meal
SmartChoice10 for $1440: $13.15 per meal
SmartChoice5 for $875: $15 per meal
That’s right. Want less food, pay more money.
You won’t be able to use your meals at Collis and the Hop, except on “meal equivalents” that the managers will choose.
Oh, and you’ll only have $125 to spend outside of meals at FoCo. That’s $.56 per day.
Not happy about this? Come protest today at 5:30 in FoCo’s lobby. David Newlove, the DDS director, will be there waiting to hear from you. Tell him what you think.
I haven’t had enough time to think through the specifics of the new dining policy. The costs are known (such as the high prices for smaller eaters) while the benefits are not (we don’t know how good the new ‘53 Commons food quality and variety will be). So I cannot offer my verdict, yet. But we know the winners and losers. The winners are big eaters; varsity athletes come to mind. If you regularly eat big meals through Dartmouth dining, SmartChoice20 saves you a lot of money. The losers are small eaters and freshmen. Small eaters will pay $875/term (the size of my current DDS dining plan) with SmartChoice5 and pay nearly twice the cost per meal that they used to. Freshmen will all be signed up automatically for SmartChoice20; I predict that few will eat their money’s worth, but all will certainly provide a lot of revenue for Dartmouth Dining Services.
For everyone else, it is a mixed bag and the success of the plan will largely be measured by what kind of quality Dartmouth students receive at such a high cost. For $10.14/meal on the SmartChoice14 plan, which is where I suspect the College is targeting most upperclassmen, I would certainly be expecting a lot. The irony in all of this is that SmartChoice sharply limits choice: where you can eat, how much you must spend, etc. As long as DDS maintains its choice-less monopoly on College student dollars with mandatory-minimum plans and limited rollover of dining dollars, it will engender student skepticism and disappointment.
Addendum: A student — not the author of the above-quoted campus-wide mailing — has written in:
Discontent with the “Smart”Choice plan seems near-universal among women (and pretty widespread among men, too), for some very legitimate reasons. Since alums (at least wealthy ones) seem to have more influence with the administration than actual students, I would appreciate a link!
She points us to a site containing a series of student comments critical of the administration’s latest gaffe.
Note (from Joe Asch): I should gently correct our correspondent away from her notion that alumni have more influence over the administration and Trustees than do students. In fact, the little clique of administrators and MBA Trustees who run the College listen to nobody but themselves.
Also, I expect that I am not alone in noticing that the new dining plan was announced simultaneously with the news that Conan O’Brien will be our Commencement speaker. Parkhurst is clever like that.
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…