Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
River Swimming: What’s Going On Here?
The entire river swimming imbroglio remains opaque. After close to 40 years of incident-free swimming at the sophomore dock, the College announced last spring that swimming there was no longer allowed, due to the risks posed by murky water, floating debris and unpredictable currents (the river flows at changing speeds because of the varying amounts of water drawn by the Wilder hydroelectric dam a few miles downstream). No explanation was ever provided by the Dean of the College’s office as to why these factors — which had been present for decades — all of a sudden posed an unacceptable danger to Dartmouth students.
Now comes the College with a new project that will once again allow swimming. According to The D’s story, the only safety-related changes to the previous facility will be the addition of an extra lifeguard and the presence of a sensor for bacteria (which has never once been cited as a problem in the recent discussions about swimming in the Connecticut). If that is the end result of the entire affair, one really has to wonder what the College was thinking here, or if anyone in the Dean’s office was thinking clearly at all?
Beyond these de minimis (that’s Latin for “face-saving”) safety changes, the bulk of the $200,000 cost of the new project seems destined to be spent on an elaborate handicap-access ramp from the Ledyard parking lot down to the new dock. As anyone familiar with the steep river bank at the site can attest, construction of the ramp shown in the above drawing will entail considerable earth moving and landscape work. What a sad end to a silly and wasteful controversy.
Note: The Town of Hanover has informed Dartblog that the College has applied for a Wetlands/Waterbody Special Exception for the new swim dock. A hearing on the new dock/location is tentatively set for March 24th at 7pm. A decision on that application could be made in early April, though these matters can drag on for a while. After that, the College must file for a building permit and line up contractors to do the work. All in all, I would not place any money on the new facility opening during the summer of 2011.
Addendum: In a recent issue of the Review, acting Dean of the College Sylvia Spears was quoted as follows:
Spears also frankly discussed instances in which her communication with students broke down. She was willing to admit that the closing of the Connecticut River docks could have been better handled.
“Regretfully…information comes to us in a time that’s not convenient …and we’re in a position where we have to make a decision,” she said, referring to the abruptness of the announcement of the River’s closing. She expressed hope that some “good news” could be announced for the 13’s prior to their own sophomore summer, but unfortunately left it at that. [Emphasis added]
What the heck did she mean? What information? In short, if there is a solid, defensible reason for closing the sophomore dock after 40 years, there is no need for Dean Spears to be so coy.
Note: Word has come to us that the College Counsel, Bob Donin, opined a while back that the sophomore docks should be closed, undoubtedly due to liability issues. Lest you think that this is the end of the story, any experienced manager knows that a lawyer’s opinions are always skewed towards caution. An executive is free to disregard counsel’s advice when it conflicts with an institution’s other interests. For example, Donin would undoubtedly be able to describe chapter and verse the liability risk to Dartmouth of having a football program or of allowing female undergraduates to be alone in the offices of male professors. The list of such real risks is as long as the list of litigators in Martindale-Hubbell. However, a president can pick and choose which risks to assume. In this instance, President Kim and Dean Spears clearly made the wrong choice — which they tacitly admit now by allowing the above-described project to go forward.
At least they didn’t blame the whole thing on the College’s insurance carrier.
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…