Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« A Real Step Forward | Home | Wither Wild Dancer? »

SEMPer Novus (1/2)

The next bright new day of student alcohol and social regulation at the College approaches on January 14th, as promised by Dean Spears, other adminstrators and students who have been working together on policies to reduce alcohol abuse and sexual assault at the College. The latest incarnation of the much derided Social Event Management Procedures (SEMP) are on their way.


As for the alcohol side of the coin, I remain disappointed. Right now there is very little bold thinking in addressing student alcohol abuse. The biggest changes to come out of the new SEMP? Two active kegs allowed instead of one! Three social-event-classification tiers instead of four — with brand new numerical classifications for attendance! And for everyone who was considering an attempt at unsafe drinking, your efforts will be thwarted by guaranteed Safety and Security walkthroughs (2+ walkthroughs during any Tails event or open party).

The truth of the matter is that any College official tasked with addressing the “drinking matter” should have a feel for the Gordian knot. Incremental changes to the last iteration of policy have not worked over the last decade.

On the one hand, an intransigent Hanover Police pushes the College to crack down on student drinking. There are the ever-present pressures of politics and image; for example, it’s no accident that the College has fought keg liberalization, and rules forbid the public display of pong tables. Ours will not be a College where students are known to have a good time!

On the other hand, students will either push back or move their drinking underground in response to harsh enforcement and onerous regulation.

In the past, Dartmouth has tried to ease its concerns of legality, liability, and image with regulations that looked weighty in print, but were easily sidestepped in practice. It’s a kind of regulatory capture that allows most students to tolerate onerous regulations… precisely because they aren’t enforced too harshly. Students know the drill: when the lights flicker in a basement, cups of beer disappear just in time for S&S to ensure that the party is in full compliance with the rule of law. This arrangement has proven useful in many ways, but less than ideal.

I am unconvinced that the administrators writing the new SEMP grasp this paradigm of social management. If policies are changed to be both more restrictive and if they are enforced, drinking will move underground. If the rules add more red-tape, the College will continue to burden students with administrative tasks and fail to produce any results. And if pure liberalization rules the day, the College may be seen as negligent in allowing students to make their own poor or unsightly decisions.

I believe there are bold strokes to be taken if we really want to slice the Gordian knot from a harm-reduction standpoint. The Good Sam Policy is the crown jewel of the College’s policy actions to date. As it stands, SEMP 2.0 won’t cut it. Stay posted for some of my own ideas in Part 2, and read the working draft of SEMP 2.0 for yourself.

Joe Asch’s Addendum: We cannot point out too often that the College’s alcohol “problem” is one of enforcement, not exceptional abuse. Alcohol over-consumption is a generalized student issue in America, but the manner in which schools and local police forces respond to it differs. According to the the federal government’s Clery Act statistics, in 2009 Dartmouth has 110 “Arrests On campus.” At Harvard, Brown, Penn and Columbia — hardly monastic institutions — there were no arrests at all, not a single one. Yale and Princeton has 10 arrests each, and Cornell had 20 on-campus arrests.


Featured posts

  • August 14, 2013
    Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
    History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
  • June 25, 2013
    Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
    Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at should be presumed copyright 2004-2018 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.




June 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30