Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
Market Wages at Dartmouth? Never!
The choice that the College has made to overpay its staff stems from the administration’s acceptance of the doctrine of the “living wage” — a policy advanced in the far left circles of the Democratic Party, which asserts that wages set by the market (even though these are almost invariably well above the legal minimum wage) are immorally low. Wages, according to this line of thinking, should have a floor based on a supposed calculation of the actual cost of living. This set of ideas echoes the teachings of Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical of May 15, 1891.
Curiously, when the College makes an economic calculation, for one reason or another it always seems to fall on the side of paying more to its employees rather than less. In his Report to the General Faculty, October 28, 2002, Jim Wright said:
Compensation strategy for both faculty and staff. Over the last three years, Dartmouth has allocated an additional $1.8 million to Arts and Sciences faculty compensation and a similar amount to staff compensation. This has allowed Dartmouth to bring faculty salaries closer to the mean of our peer institutions and to be more competitive with our staff salaries.
As regards the faculty, bringing “faculty salaries closer to the mean of our peer institutions” make prima facie sense. We don’t want to lose the best faculty members to other schools because we pay them less. But the calculation seems to ignore the fact that living in central New Hampshire costs approximately 18% less than living in Cambridge, Massachusetts, our closest Ivy neighbor, according to federal statistics. The cost of living here is half what it is in Manhattan, and 10-15% below all of our other Ivy competitors, except for Cornell (the overall cost of living in Ithaca is about 4% less expensive than central NH). So if we are paying the Ivy mean, we are giving our faculty more purchasing power than all of the other Ivy schools except Cornell.
And as for staff, the administration’s goal does not seem to be to align ourselves with our peer institutions. Of course, that would make no economic sense; a cook or an administrative assistant would not be wooed away from Dartmouth by Harvard to work in Cambridge. So what does Wright mean by the phrase, “to be more competitive with our staff salaries”? In the Upper Valley market for labor, we are already much more than competitive. The local market is a low-cost-of-living, low-wage one, which potentially gives us a huge advantage over most other Ivy Institutions — given that the market allows us to charge the same tuition and fees that the other Ivies charge. Even the Poverty in America group, which seems to be the home base for living wage ideology, estimated the living wage for a single person in Hanover to be $8.37/hour, whereas the similar floor in Cambridge is $12.17/hour. So why do we over-pay? The only answer is that Dartmouth has chosen to pay along ideological lines — an expression of guilty privilege — rather than follow the local market.
When historians write Jim Wright’s legacy, they will note his building program, his neglect of the faculty and any type of innovation, and most importantly, his effort to buy support from the faculty and staff by setting up a College pay scale that wastes tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars each year. Jim Kim has done little more than nibble around the edges of this situation.
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…