Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Share the Heat | Home | Hot Cars: Doing Well by Doing Good »
Three Reasons Not to Sell Minary
Correspondents have checked in with good reasons for the College not to behave shortsightedly in selling the Minary Center.
At one point, Magdalen College at Oxford contemplated auctioning off an Assyrian relief which had been given to it in the 19th century. The relief was worth millions. But after sober consideration, policymakers there realized that such a sale would have a long-lasting chilling effect on non-cash donations — which over the centuries had been the source of some of Magdalen’s greatest treasures. Donors, it seems, do not want to think that the institution to which they just gave their First Folio might flog it for cash at a later date.
Additionally, while the College has been unimaginative in its use of Minary, the Center has nonetheless been a vital off-campus meeting ground for faculty and administrators. Professors and deans bunk together, brainstorm, get to know each other, and generally think creatively about the direction of their respective departments, programs and the College itself. At an institution that has been bereft of creative inspiration over the past decades, Minary could be used to re-start the flow of ideas from professors to the Administration.
Finally, as I wrote the other day, the current real estate market for luxury properties like Minary is mixed at the very best. In the present climate, large corporations are loathe to splash our money for ostentatious retreats, and the private equity world is spending cautiously. A professional in the luxury property field tells me that the College will probably get one or two low-ball offers for Minary in short order, but then bidders will fold their arms and wait for the asking price to come down. In the end, Dartmouth could lose an irreplaceable functioning asset for an embarrassingly low price.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…