Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« If You Were President Kim? | Home | The Rise of the Adjuncts »
Sometimes We Win, Mostly We Lose — According to Mort
Trustee Candidate Mort Kondracke has an interesting nugget on his website:
… when a student is accepted at both Dartmouth and any other Ivy League school, we lose the overwhelming number to every one but Cornell.
If true, this is very disturbing information, but I wonder where Mort obtained it? In order to get verification, I went to the source — in the usual Dartblog manner — in this case, to the estimable Dan Parish ‘89 of the Admissions Office. Herewith his reponse:
Joe,
Thank you for your message and for your question.I don’t believe that there is any publicly available information on the numbers of students who choose Dartmouth as compared to another college when admitted to both.
I assume that these numbers are not public in part because the data that Dartmouth and other institutions collect on these trends are based on self-reported student information (there is no way to share individual admissions results, student-by-student, among institutions).
Thanks again - sorry not to have more information,
Dan
Dan Parish
Director of Admissions Recruitment and Communication
Dartmouth College
The chart to the right accompanied a NYT story by David Leonhardt from 2006. It summarizes a survey of 3,200 high school seniors at 500 schools across the country. While the College does poorly against HYP (93%, 88% and 81% respectively of graduating high school students would choose those schools over the College), we lose only marginally to Brown and Columbia, and we take more students than we lose among seniors contemplating four years in Ithaca or downtown Philly.
These are not great results, but neither do they indicate an “overwhelming” preference for our sister Ivies (except Cornell).
The great thing about the Internet is that a writer can link to sources. I’ll follow up with Mort and ask him where he obtained his info.
Addendum: It looks like Mort will not be revealing his sources on this one, according to his official campaign manager, Stephanie Lewin:
Mr. Asch,
I am not choosing to communicate with you any longer as you violated a personal trust by publishing my personal email to the larger community.Stephanie Lewin
What a shame. I really am interested to see if Mort’s assertion is true.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…