Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« IOC to Look Into Celebrations by Women Hockey Team | Home | The Whole Academic World Is Watching »
The Dartmouth (Sports) Experience
Government Professor Alan Stam, who left these climes several years ago to improve the University of Michigan, wrote the below piece at the time when the College was riven by the revelation that Dean of Admissions “King Karl” Furstenberg had written a letter on College stationary to the President of Swarthmore condemning varsity athletics (“football, and the culture that surrounds it, is antithetical to the academic mission of colleges such as ours.”) Furstenberg announced his retirement the following year — to the great relief of Dartmouth’s coaches.
Stam later observed to me that he had been told that reprints of his article graced the office walls of college and high school coaches across the country.
Dartblog has already praised President Kim”s resolve in protecting all of the College’s varsity sports teams from budget cuts, and it is worth urging here that club sports teams be similarly protected. The number of club teams has soared since my day in Hanover; athletes less gifted than our varsity recruits still seek the joy of wearing green, and the communal pleasure of playing on a competitive team. Herewith Professor Stam’s memorable column:
In its Dec. 17 editorial that expressed support for Dartmouth Dean of Admissions Carl Furstenberg, the Valley News opined that, “(I)t’s hard to grasp the rationale for excluding that budding poet or philosopher in preference to a recruited athlete if providing a world class education is your mission.” Hard indeed. That is, if one falls prey to a couple of dubious assumptions.
First, to assert that recruited athletes have less value we must assume that recruited athletes cannot be budding poets or philosophers. Second, even if the first is true, we must also assume that budding poets and philosophers add more to other students’ education than do the athletes on campus. Not having access to the private information that one would need to actually base such judgments in fact, I can rely only on my own experiences, both as a varsity athlete in Cornell University’s rowing program and as a tenured professor in Dartmouth’s Government Department.
Regarding the first, the students I rowed with at Cornell have now gone on to be physicians, engineers, university professors, investment bankers and real estate developers, among other professions. I honestly do not see any difference in the relative value of a discussion dissecting the views of Hegel or Foucault versus a conversation analyzing the most efficient rowing stroke, although the results of the latter will be subject to an empirical test on Saturday morning while the former will simply vanish into the ether at dawn’s first light.
Among my valued friends in the Upper Valley whom I count on both for camaraderie as well as the occasional helping hand, a majority are former college athletes. The bankers, doctors, architects, builders and writers I hang out with today were football players, track stars, soccer players, oarsmen and skiers back in the day.It is true that our academic performance as undergraduates likely suffered to some degree because of the long hours we committed to being the best athletes we could. The time spent running, lifting weights and rowing in the dark came from somewhere, and I often chose to sleep, eat and prepare for races than put in the extra hours studying that would have been needed to maintain the highest possible grades.
In those hours of extraordinary physical effort shared with 20 other young men, I also learned things about life that those meeker souls cloistered in the library still do not understand. You’ll have to ask my current students and colleagues, both the jocks and the poets, if the sacrifice had any long-term deleterious effect on my performance today, whether standing at the lectern or publishing in scholarly journals.
To accomplish extraordinary things in life, very often one must work harder than one could ever imagine, and do so in cooperation and absolute trust with other like-minded people. That sense of shared mission, sacrifice and achievement simply cannot be gained from reading about it in a book or talking about it in some all-night bull session. To learn that you can rise to the most difficult occasions and challenges that life will throw at you, you must actually do them rather than simply contemplate them. Only my prior service as an enlisted man in the U.S. Army, another group that the intellectual effete looks down upon, better prepared me for life’s real challenges — as compared with imagined ones — than did my experiences preparing for and racing in eight-man shells.
At the end of the day, we also must realize that in this discussion about the value of athletics versus intellectualism, in most every instance we are talking about a tradeoff between one relatively mediocre performer versus another. While community leaders and academic administrators spout nonsense about everyone being above average or, in the case of an elite educational institution, that everyone present is truly extraordinary, the truth is that only the astonishingly rare Ivy League student-athlete will become a professional. In the big scheme of things, the vast majority are merely competent athletes, as well as being good students.
The same, however, is true of those budding philosophers and poets. The undergraduate poet, as well as the athlete, will wake up one day and realize he or she must go to work in the real world. Only a minuscule proportion go on to actually make their living writing poetry or philosophizing. The question is which way of spending time in college better prepares our students for their future roles in our community? Through the shared sacrifice and exultation found in organized sports and competition, or in the pedantic and nitpicking conversations of collegiate sophists?
I’ll take the mediocre athletes over the mediocre poets and navel-gazers any day. I often wonder if the loathsome dismissiveness with which America’s intellectuals view athletes, soldiers, business people and politicians lies in their own insecurities rather than any better sense of judgment they might have than the rest of us.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…