Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« New H. Po Alcohol Policy — Audience Response | Home | Nicholas Giaccone Has an Idea »
New H. Po Alcohol Policy — Analysis
So what is going on here? Some background:
Erstwhile Dean of the College Tom Crady explicitly sought to lighten the enforcement of the alcohol laws by Safety & Security so that the College’s efforts would be in line with the policies at most other institutions. He had written his Ph.D. dissertation on alcohol enforcement at undergraduate institutions. Crady told me that, curiously, the biggest barrier to change was the staff members in his own office. This latter point might explain the stop-and-go implementation of any new SEMP/AMP policy and the delays in the reform of the student adjudication board. Crady said that he had also planned to work with the H.Po on enforcement.
President Kim has commented that he would seek to relax the environment around alcohol on campus so that safety would be the primary goal of Dartmouth’s Safety and Security force, and that students’ educational futures would not be jeopardized by over-zealous enforcement of the laws.
The new Dean of the College, Sylvia Spears, has been circumspect on the subject. The only clue to her thoughts might be that alcohol enforcement at the University of Rhode Island — the institution from which she has obtained all of her degrees — seems to mirror Hanover in hostility.
Dartblog posted extensively on the subject in the fall. Read the eight posts in order: the first here, the second here, the third here, the fourth here, the fifth here, the sixth here the seventh here and the eighth here. Did we stir up a hornet’s nest by negatively comparing H.Po. to municipal forces like that of Middlebury, Vermont?
I doubt it. My sense is that all of the above factors pushed a rigid officer of the law in a direction that he did not want to go, and now he is pushing back. With what goal? To declare his independence? To strike back at students that he perceives as spoiled? To encourage to Town to buy out his contract?
Who knows? We are in for several eventful months.
Oh, and have a great Winter Carnival.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…