Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« New H. Po Alcohol Policy — Details | Home | New H. Po Alcohol Policy — Analysis »
New H. Po Alcohol Policy — Audience Response
Students in attendance at the meeting and their advisors were vigorous in their response.
The first volley of questions sought to determine why this policy was being put into place now. Students stated that alcohol use had not varied in recent years, and if the number of Good Sam calls had increased slightly last year, this change was due entirely to students prudently using Good Sam for the safety of fellow students. A few observed that the new policy was a negative response to students’ more responsible behavior.
Numerous students mentioned that the policy would drive drinking behind closed doors and would end Dartmouth’s long, cherished tradition of open Greek parties. Students would now pre-game in their dorms, and then go to Greek houses that would only be open to brothers/sisters and their named guests (so that sting operatives would not be able to gain access to the houses).
A number of students sought to be conciliatory, asking for a “grace period” before the new enforcement régime was put into place, or asking the police to work more cooperatively with the Greeks on the problem, or suggesting that education was the solution rather than harsher punishment. Students sought to speak truth to power, but power was all they got in return from an intransigent Chief and his aggressive prosecutor.
I commented publicly at the meeting that this level of enforcement was no more than vindictive punishment, and was not at all necessary, given that the Hanover Police could use its discretion to limit its enforcement of alcohol-related laws on the books — in the same way that all of the municipal police departments at other Ivy schools turn a blind eye to student drinking on campus. I mentioned that the enforcement of the alcohol laws by the H. Po had long been the harshest in the Ivy League, with no positive result, and that tightened enforcement could lead to dangerous consequences if students feared to enlist the aid of the police in the case of severely intoxicated friends.
The Chief seemed to acknowledge that enforcement was different in other Ivy towns when he replied that if students “don’t like it in Hanover, they can go to another Ivy League school.”
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…