Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Buddy’s Back For Another Year | Home | Home for Thankgiving 1945 »
Dartmouth Salaries: The 7% Solution
When you root around at any length in Dartmouth’s compensation plans, you find generosities larded on top of absurdities — all of which cost the College many millions of dollars each year to no discernable purpose. How about this astounding perk, the likes of which I have never seen in the private sector:
7% Special Benefit
Salaried staff age 40 and older will receive an additional 7% of base salary.
7% Special Benefit
Faculty age 40 and older will receive an additional 7% of base salary.
On top of the inflated wages, huge benefits and extra-generous vacations, we find, what exactly? An extended reward for turning 40? Happy Birthday! What could the justification be for such a sugar plum? Are our 40+-year-olds being raided by an avaricious private sector seeking their extraordinary skills? Do 40+-year-olds have particular needs that under-40’s don’t have? Are we happy to discriminate against youth?
Of course, faculty do have the latitude to apply this 7% to their retirement accounts — or take it as cash — but this extra bonus already comes on top of the 10% salary premium that the over-35 crowd gets from the College for retirement savings. Nobody is suffering there.
Why don’t we just conclude that these are special times which call for special measures: President Kim, drop the 7% special benefit.
My word, if the College were run like a private business, not only would we not be in a financial crisis, we would have more money that we know what to do with. Then, by putting money towards ends that directly benefit students, we could provide an extraordinary educational experience — or at least ensure that students get into the classes that they want.
Where were our supposedly experienced and vigilant Trustees when all of these extravagant, wasteful policies were put into place?
Addendum: I’d be surprised if this 7% benefit costs the College any less than $10,000,000 each year.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…