Dartblog
Special Feature: The rent's unpaid, dear.
Fiscal infelicity, two (or more) open trustee seats, a deep endowment draw in a rough market. Not to mention the Second Dartmouth College Case. Jim Kim & Co. have a lot to contemplate. Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Breaking: Folt Named Acting Provost | Home | More on Danny Blanchflower, Superstar »
Why Do I Write (Critically) About Dartmouth?
I am asked this question all the time and, frankly, I am mystified by it. Parents all over America work on their kids’ school PTA, and they coach in local sports associations, serve on zoning boards, send in letters to the editor about municipal matters, give money to their college, and volunteer endlessly in other areas — yet when I choose to spend some time highlighting in print the ways in which Dartmouth could/should be improved, people are at a loss to understand my motivation. Exactly how are my actions different from these other activities? Perhaps there are no other alums doing this kind of thing at the College, but that is all the more reason to fill a void.
I have audited undergraduate classes and discussion groups for fifteen years, and in doing so I have gotten to know a large number of students and faculty members. Over the years, I’ve acquired a fair bit of experience in the running of businesses large and small. Nothing unusual or special there, but I came to realize that this background gives me a perspective that is different from that of most other observers of the College. And so it seemed natural to share my perceptions about Dartmouth: first with about 30 columns in the D between 2001-2009, and now on Dartblog.
I don’t find that conduct strange. Wouldn’t you do the same if you perceived that an institution that you cared about was losing its way?
Clearly Dartmouth is at a crossroads. Whether you agree with the people who ran as petition candidates or not, they touched a nerve for the many thousands of alumni who supported them. If crowds possess any wisdom at all, at least some of these candidates’ critical observations about the College are correct.
Strange for me are the boosters on the Alumni Council and the various losing candidates in alumni trustee races, all of who can’t seem to allow themselves to say anything critical about the College — anything at all. They don’t help Dartmouth with their slavish praise, yet they are certainly too smart to believe that all is perfect in Hanover. The more interesting question for me is why these people act as they do.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…