Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Snapshots from the Flotsam of Recession | Home | Dartmouth’s termly manufactured controversy over the ‘Greek system’: The 09F edition »


Alcohol Enforcement: Let’s Compare Middlebury and UVM

Eighth in a series; read the first here, the second here, the third here, the fourth here, the fifth here, the sixth here and the seventh here.

We’ve been writing about the simple fact that Dartmouth students don’t need—but certainly have—the experience of getting arrested just for getting drunk. We’ve already discovered that this is a part of the Dartmouth experience that the administration and local police have elected to create. Dartblog has long endorsed the old fashioned method of policing: a cop should drive you home, if he needs to; he shouldn’t arrest you for having one too many Keystones. Likewise S&S, which should exercise some patrol ownership over the College.

It’s all a matter of discretion.

Hanover Police Chief Giaccone, one of this page’s illustrious readers, directed me yesterday to the heavy enforcement of the underage drinking laws in Burlington as evidence that these laws are enforced in Vermont — in response to my recent research showing that in the town of Middlebury, the police and Middlebury’s Public Safety force turn a blind eye to underage drinking by students.

Let’s turn to the Clery Report stats again to compare the enforcement experience at Middlebury and at UVM:

In the 2005-2007 period, Middlebury had no police arrests at all for liquor law violations, and it has 58 disciplinary violations for alcohol.

In the same period, UVM reported 23 arrests for alcohol, and disciplinary violations for alcohol totaled 2,667. (This is not a typo. You can look it up yourself.)

UVM has 12,800 students and Middlebury has 2,455. Running the numbers, we can see that UVM is a little more than five times as large as Middlebury, but it had 46 times as many alcohol violations over the three-year period. That means that UVM had approximately nine times as many violations per capita as Middlebury (actually the figure is probably greater than this because UVM, with its graduate and professional school population, has a smaller proportion of underage students than Middlebury).

Given that the state drinking laws are identical in both of these Vermont towns, what are the possible conclusions that we can draw from these figures?

1) UVM students drink nine times as much as Middlebury students and the level of enforcement in the two places is the same.

2) UVM students drink about as much as Middlebury students but the Burlington Police Department and UVM’s Police Services use their discretion to take a widely differing posture on enforcing these laws.

You can decide.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2012 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

Search

Archives

Links