Dartblog
Special Feature: The rent's unpaid, dear.
Fiscal infelicity, two (or more) open trustee seats, a deep endowment draw in a rough market. Not to mention the Second Dartmouth College Case. Jim Kim & Co. have a lot to contemplate. Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« There is not a thing wrong with Dartmouth Trustee Elections | Home | If this ain’t tradition… »
President Kim on Bill Moyers Journal
Bill Moyers interviewed President Kim for a segment on PBS’s Bill Moyers Journal airing this weekend, and I must say, I was thoroughly impressed with President Kim’s answers. You can view the entire interview here.
The discussion centered around what makes a good health care system, a topic on which Dr. Kim sounds eminently sensible. But in the course of his answers on health care, Dr. Kim made a number of telling statements relating to his leadership style and his aspirations for Dartmouth. I was particularly pleased with the following remark, in which Dr. Kim explains the importance of methodical measurement of progress in achieving major goals.
DR. JIM YONG KIM: Well, I’ve noticed over the years that when it comes to our most cherished social goals, not only do we tolerate poor execution, sometimes we celebrate poor execution. Sometimes it’s part of the culture. You know, these folks are trying to solve this terrible problem. They can’t keep their books straight.
They really don’t know what they’re getting. They don’t measure anything. But they’re on the right side, so that’s okay. I think we’re in a different time.
That is the best explanation of Dartmouth’s current predicament I have seen in a while. Among Dartmouth’s bloated bureaucracy, poor execution is “part of the culture.” The bureaucrats work hard individually, and are good people, “on the right side,” but the system “[doesn’t] measure anything.” It never takes stock of itself to say, “what the heck is going on here?”
If President Kim is brave enough to bring his insistence on careful, honest measurement of progress to Dartmouth, where the statistics collected during the Wright era were always disingenuous and sometimes absurd, then Dartmouth’s future looks bright.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…