Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Work Like a Soul Inspired | Home | ‘The Choice’ — Kipling »
A Modest Proposal for Alumni Trustee Elections, Part 2
Following procedures laid out in the Association of Alumni constitution, recent Alumni Trustee elections have followed the below schedule:
As we saw yesterday, 97.5% of the spending in Stephen Smith’s campaign was incurred in paying for mailings to alumni, advertising in the Alumni Magazine and placing on-line ads on The Dartmouth’s website. A proposal: If the AoA agreed to cover these specific costs in the future for both Alumni-Council-nominated candidates and petition candidates, in exchange for limits on other campaign spending, I would be surprised if the petition candidates didn’t accept such an offer.
Spending by petitioners would necessarily be unlimited during the petition-gathering period that takes place before voting starts, in order that petitioners may gather the necessary signatures. However, after the petition deadline, the College would cover the cost of ads by the candidates in the D and the DAM and, say, two joint mailings: one at the start of campaigning, and one just before the start of voting. Each mailing would include two sheets of paper per candidate on which candidates could write whatever they wished. That would be the allowed extent of written communications mailed by the candidates to alumni. The College could also organize limited e-mails by the candidates. The cost of web sites, columns for the D, and travel to Hanover would be borne by the candidates themselves as evidence of their commitment to the College.
If campaigns were organized in this manner, no serious candidate for the position of Trustee would be dissuaded from running due to financial considerations.
In addition, the College would benefit from a thorough presentation of all of the issues that are important to candidates and alumni. Open debates on the state of the College are now Dartmouth’s signature; they are vital in focusing the adminstration on its stated goals and keeping alumni linked to day-to-day life in Hanover. Gone forever are the days when an Alumni Trustee campaign consisted of a summary of the candidates’ résumés and brief position statements wherein the word “excellence” appeared as many times as was grammatically feasible.
Voting starts in less than seven months.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…