Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one that a complete rehearsal of the events to date might be in order. Things, after all, have gotten complicated.
Harvey Silverglate is perhaps the national authority on campus First Amendment issues: he co-founded the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and serves on the Board of the Massachusetts ACLU. Harvey is an exceedingly accomplished lawyer, and in Cambridge holds forth a tidy practice concentrated on civil liberties and academic freedom. When he marks a ballot in November, his is probably the precise mirror of mine, but we find ourselves in total accord on some core principals of good governance. As readers of this page will know, we two have been following events in Hanover closely.
Harvey and I endeavored to write a memorandum on the fiduciary duty of college trustees, its history, and the oddities of its performance at Dartmouth. We are thankful for the robust aid of his brilliant research assistants and paralegals Kyle Smeallie and Maria Romero, both lately of Boston College.
Dartmouth College, the Battle Over Parity, and the Legal Notion of Fiduciary Duty — Harvey A. Silverglate and Joseph Malchow. [PDF]
The memorandum is split into two parts: first, nearly the entire Dartmouth saga is narrated in chronological order, from the election of the first petition trustee through each scheme and flam meant to impair the petition process. Then, crucially, we discuss exactly how the fiduciary duty has been performed at Dartmouth and elsewhere—by the petition trustees and by the majority—and how its incorrect interpretation can lead to disastrous ends. We ground the proper conception of the duty of fiduciaries in history and in law, and then show how the Dartmouth petition “safety valve” has been an exemplary implementation of proper oversight.
If you want a primer on the Dartmouth fracas, or a fuller understanding of how college trusteeship got to where it is, do give it a read.
(Comments are most welcome. Harvey can be reached at email@example.com; I am at firstname.lastname@example.org.)
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…