Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Hanover Inn R. I. P. | Home | Figures Don’t Lie #4 Continued: Less Than 20-Students Classes — Where Are They? »


Figures Don’t Lie #4: % of Less Than 20-Students Classes

Small Class.jpgThe ever-evolving Dartblog Style Book restrains writers from referring to a subject as a “textbook case” unless the textbook itself is to hand. Fortunately for this writer, I have the book! As we examine the administration’s oft-made (and previously criticized here and here) boast that “…over the past decade… we also have offered more classes with fewer than 20 students, going from 57 percent to 64 percent of our classes,” we can can legitimately deem this figure a textbook example of a misleading statistic and refer to Professor Joel Levine’s Introduction to Data Analysis: The Rules of Evidence, the book he has employed for more than a decade in the Mathematics and Social Science 15 course of the same name.

Introduction to Data Analysis devotes ten full pages to laying out how the percentage of <20-student classes measurement confuses rather than enlightens students about the quality of a university. For a summary of why this statistic is yet another example of legerdemain on the part of the administration, examine the following two universities:

University A
Total # of Classes: 30
# of Classes with 19 Students: 20
# of Classes with 101 Students: 10
% of classes with <20 students: 67%

University B
Total # of Classes: 30
# of Classes with 19 Students: 20
# of Classes with 30 Students: 10
% of classes with <20 students: 67%

Which school would you rather attend? After all, both universities have the same percentage of classes with <20 students.

It does not take much reflection to see that the percentage of classes with <20 students statistic isn’t much help to you in making this decision. It rates both schools equally. As such, the percentage of small classes measure meets the test of a bad statistic: it rates two quite different situations equally. (Another banal example: the average height of professors at Dartmouth and at the University of New Hamsphire is equal, therefore…)

Here’s a better way of analyzing the same two schools:

University A
# of Students in Classes with <20 Students: 380 (20 classes of 19 students equals...)
# of Students in Classes with 20-80 Students: 0
# of Students in Classes with >100 or more Students: 1,010
% of Students in Classes with <20 Students: 27%

University B
# of Students in Classes with <20 Students: 380
# of Students in Classes with 20-80 Students: 300
# of Students in Classes with >100 or more Students: 0
% of Students in Classes with <20 Students: 56%

At University A, your chances as a student of being in a small class are 27%; at University B, your odds of being in a small class are 56%. Again, which school would you rather attend? This statistic is more helpful, don’t you think?

Here is the exact breakdown of the student experience at Dartmouth for the 2008-2009 year as drawn from the ever-helpful Dartmouth Fact Book:

Student Enrollments by Class Size
2-19 students: 34%
20-29 students: 15%
30-39 students: 14%
40-49 students: 10%
50+ students: 28%

Despite the administration’s assertion that almost two thirds of Dartmouth classes have <20 students, in fact, only a third of Dartmouth students found themselves in classes with <20 students last year. From a student’s perceptive, that is a more honest statistic.

Tomorrow: We’ll look briefly at where those classes are to be found (and where they aren’t).

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2013 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

June 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Search

Archives

Links