Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in the case of former trustee Todd Zywicki ‘88. Dartblog has covered that unreelection here and here.
I put reelection in quotes up above for a couple of reasons:
One, in no sense can reappointment by the Board of Trustees properly be considered an “election” of any sort. Indeed that is what the whole issue of (now-defunct) Parity was all about: the notion that the passage of judgment by the full body of distinguished Dartmouth alumni comprised an election, whereas the sentiments of the existing Board was something less.
Two, it is profoundly ironic that an individual, such as Mr. Zywicki, who served the Dartmouth Board and community with distinction and, importantly, was elected by the ballots of thousands of alumni, could be dismissed because of the whims of a few individuals.
Finally, it is becoming increasingly clear just how the so-called “reelection” discussions proceed, a process so abysmal—at least in Todd Zywicki’s case—that any and all trustees wishing to fulfill their legitimate duties to the College would be justified in boycotting.
The process begins with 21 (currently) or as many as 24 trustees) future walking in to a room, no more than 8 of these men and woman will have been elected by the full body of Dartmouth alumni. These individuals exclude the trustee under consideration from the room, whereupon all manner of charges and falsehoods might be levied against the individual. The trustee under examination is not informed of and cannot contest the statements made against him (incidentally I believe that similar principles were at issue in the 2004 case of Hamdi v Rumsfeld in which the Supreme Court ruled against such absurdity—but, no matter, in this post-Parity world anything goes). Information presented is not checked for accuracy and may not be corrected later if new information later comes to light. And, the kicker, members of the Dartmouth community—students, alumni, professors, etc—can’t know about any of the goings on, save that released in official statements, because of the Board’s confidentiality rules.
A Kangaroo Court, indeed.
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…