Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Trustee Todd Zywicki: “My Deepest Thanks…” | Home | Valley News Reports on Board’s Improper Removal »

The Dartmouth Editorial Board Comes Out Against Dismissal of Trustee Zywicki

Read the editorial, in which College spokesman Roland Adams deliberately prevaricates about the existence of Board of Trustees bylaws, here. It is also reprinted below.

More to come.

CORREX: This post originally reference Roland Burris. Burris, of course, is the Illinois Senator. Adams is the College spokesman. But he did fib: the Dartmouth Board, ever since the introduction into it of alumni-elected petitioners, operates on exceptionally constricting bylaws and by a secret ‘oath.’ Here is Mr. Adams nothing those bylaws in a press release.

Wrongful Termination

We were dismayed to learn of the Board of Trustees’ decision not to reelect Trustee Todd Zywicki ‘88 for a second term (“Board votes not to reelect Zywicki ‘88,” April 7). Even in the wake of Zywicki’s open letter to the Dartmouth community on Tuesday (“Zywicki ‘88 criticizes Board in open letter,” April 15), the Board has yet to provide the Dartmouth community with a sufficient explanation for the removal.

Since 1990, when the power to reelect alumni trustees was transferred from alumni to the Board itself, reappointment to the Board for a second term has generally been routine; Zywicki is the first trustee in recent history to be denied reelection.

Unless Zywicki, a petition trustee elected by alumni to the Board in 2005, committed an as yet undisclosed but egregious act, we believe that he deserves to retain the seat that the College’s alumni elected him to fill.

Zywicki said in his letter that comments he made during an address at the John William Pope Center in October 2007 “might have been” one of the reasons behind the Board’s decision. In the address, Zywicki made a series of controversial and inflammatory statements, including calling former College President James Freedman “truly evil.”

While we certainly believe that Zywicki’s comments at the Pope Center were in violation of the conduct expected of our trustees, we do not view them as grounds for unilateral removal. Neither did the Board, it seems, in January 2008, when it voted to publicly reprimand Zywicki for his conduct, charging that he “had exercised poor judgment and had violated his responsibilities as a trustee of Dartmouth College” (“Board votes to reprimand Zywicki,” Jan. 7, 2008).

There appears to be no precedent for the removal of a trustee, and according to College spokesman Roland Adams, the Board does not have bylaws. It therefore seems likely that it is well within the Board’s power to expel, mid-term, a trustee who is guilty of extreme misconduct. Why the Board waited as long as it did to remove Zywicki, if that removal is in response to the Pope Center comments, therefore remains a mystery.

Assuming that no egregious act remains undisclosed (and there has been no indication that this is the case), Zywicki’s removal disregards the will of the alumni who put him on the Board, and contradicts the democratic manner in which alumni elect trustees.

Dissenting opinions are essential to the operation of any governing body. While Zywicki may have behaved unprofessionally, the public reprimand issued by the Board was sufficient punishment. It is one thing to reprimand a trustee for making statements against the College in a public forum, but to remove dissenting opinions from the boardroom is to undermine the will of the alumni who voted in support of those very views.


Featured posts

  • August 14, 2013
    Breaking: Of Crips and Bloods and Memories of Ghetto Parties
    History repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, or sometimes it just repeats itself. From the New York Times on November 30, 1998: At Dartmouth College, white students at a ”ghetto party” dressed…
  • June 25, 2013
    Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson’s War on Students Part (2/2)
    Part 1, Part 2 Today’s post again recounts the events that befell the Freshman. However, the content of the Hanover Police department report reproduced in this space yesterday is supplemented by information from my own…
  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at should be presumed copyright 2004-2018 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.




June 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30