Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
Chrysler & Fiat
The following message was just beamed to my BlackBerry:
Chrysler has found an international partner in Fiat but the auto maker isn’t out of the woods, mainly because the deal is contingent on Chrysler getting $3 billion in additional government loans.
Chrysler and Italy’s Fiat confirmed they had reached an agreement on an alliance that would give Fiat a 35% stake in the American company. Fiat would not put any cash into Chrysler but would provide technology and vehicles that Chrysler could build and sell in the U.S.

Like the hazy-eyed violets of the corporate world, the huddled faithful who believe that federal diktats—match that contribution! insure that family! withhold those taxes!—that force employers to leech upon their paychecks actually materially alter overall compensation…like those believing souls are Cerberus and Fiat. Fiat will rescue Chrysler—but it’ll only work if U.S. taxpayers kick in about thee bil’? Why, they must take Nancy Pelosi for a fool.
Larry Kudlow’s brilliant little locution for this—bailout nation, he calls it—is right on. The calculus of some MBA with Stata shows that $3B is what this duo can wrench from the people without too many questions being asked; entirely unnecessary, it is free candy, and why shouldn’t Fiat make its deal a little more comfortable? Now these fresh Democrat politicians, who get evaluated in just two years, can either be responsible for letting Chrysler tumble, or they can allocate a paltry sum to lock the deal up. The money isn’t needed in the first place, but the new bailout nation rules have constructed a bargaining game in which one party has no sway at all.
Here’s my prediction: it’s going to turn out that private parties can very ably come to the rescue of almost every deserving distressed private party. And every rescuer is going to want a hit of the TARP. It’ll net out to the same result as if no one had had a hit of the TARP.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…