Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Constitutional Cruelty | Home | Everything is going to be a vision with this guy »
Chilling Codes on Canada College Campus
At Queen’s University in Ontario, restrictions on free speech on one college campus has been taken to a new level. The university has hired “dialogue facilitators” who will intervene in student conversations to promote correct speech and sensitive terminology. These ‘facilitators’ will not be present in classrooms but rather, because they are also students at the college, will perform their job specifically in dining hall, common areas, dormitories, etc. I put ‘facilitators’ in quotes because I think it is pretty clear to anyone who has attended college or possesses common sense that these folks will not be facilitating much of anything. Rather, conversations that may have formerly and freely grappled with issues like religion, sexual orientation, public policies, etc will surely turn to inhibited and self-conscious mush. That or students will simply turn their conversations to less stimulating, but normatively safer areas of discourse (sports, for example, rather than sociology). Further, I suspect that, once widely known, students will not hold conversations within a hundred-foot radius of these people.
One facilitator describes his role as follows:
“We are trained to interrupt behaviour in a non-blameful and non-judgmental manner, so it’s not like we’re pulling someone aside and reprimanding them about their behaviour. It is honestly trying to get to the root of what they’re trying to say - seeing if that can be said in a different manner.”
The only fortunate thing about the program appears to be that there are only six such facilitators out of a campus of thousands of students. Still the chilling effect on speech may remain, somebody may be listening to what you say and preparing to reeducate you. So much for even the pretense of free speech and open exchange.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…