Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Wish You Were Here | Home | Yoo, Bolton for Balance of Power, Civil Liberties(?) »
Military Uncertain and Pessimistic Towards Incoming President
Despite several obvious overtures towards the military, it seems President-elect Barack Obama is not gaining much ground. According to a Military Times survey, 6 out of 10 active duty service members are uncertain or pessimistic about their incoming commander. Perhaps this number is unsurprising as only 1 in 4 service members supported him during the election. He obviously lacks military experience, yet enters office with the burden of several election cycle promises to the American public that could have serious consequences for the military. Such a combination is sure to put some service members on guard. For those who have forgotten, Obama has promised a 16 month timetable for withdrawal from Iraq, in addition to calling for the end of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy regarding gay and lesbian members of the military. Controversial promises that may please his democrat base, but alienate the more conservative soldiers putting their lives in harm’s way for all of us everyday.
As our country is built upon civilian control of the military, the animosity of service members does not present a significant challenge to his authority. It does, however, show one of the major hurdles that Obama must face in his first years in office. Not even the numerous peace offerings from the Obama camp have changed the pessimism and uncertainty towards his leadership. Choosing to retain well respected Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, currently serving under President George W. Bush, and to bring in a former general as his National Security Advisor are just two of these overtures. He also chose to continue the recent use of the Virginia Military Institute corps of cadets in the inaugural parade. Certainly these gestures of good will towards a sector of our population that one might expect a Democrat president to marginalize are promising. If he continues to demonstrate a respect and desire to understand the military when making foreign policy choices, his popularity, or at least acceptability, amongst members of the military will grow. Any signs of hostility or high handedness towards the military, however, could prove to be a significant handicap in the pursuit of his international goals.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…