Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Homecoming Round-Up | Home | Dartmouth’s Untraveled »


Calorie Counts: Friend or Foe?

In January, the New York City Board of Health voted unanimously to force chain restaurants in the city to disclose calories counts for their menu items. Many lauded this move as just one more way that government can help encourage its citizens to eat healthier, but it has numerous pitfalls. Aside from creating citizens more dependent on government interference in a matter that is inherently personal, it adversely affects the health of those with eating disorders.

Marcia Herrin, founder of the Dartmouth College Eating Disorders Prevention, Education and Treatment Program, considered the posting of calorie counts in Dartmouth dining facilities about 10 years ago.

“We decided not to post calories because students struggling with eating disorders said very plainly that this information would cause them harm…Students recovering from eating disorders found that not having the calories listed helped them overcome their obsession and fear of calories…I often have them practice eating in Dartmouth’s dining hall so they can handle joining friends for a nice dinner at an off-campus restaurant, or getting ready for the family Thanksgiving dinner. Most restaurants (especially nice ones) don’t publish calorie counts, and of course neither do families.”

In the end then, government must choose which citizens to protect. Though I know Zak disagrees with me, I have always been inclined to support bans on smoking in restaurants. Second hand smoke is highly dangerous for those around it, bothering people with asthma and creating risks of lung cancer. Smoking itself has no health benefits of which I am aware. With these facts in hand, it seems perfectly reasonable to me for government to make the eating environment healthier for workers and patrons alike.

Calorie posting is clearly a separate issue. Does it really make the average American ordering that Bloomin’ Onion at Outback Steakhouse rethink the 2,310 calories it carries? Or does it push those already suffering from food obsessions to purging after a nice meal with friends? I would argue for government to remain out of the business of policing calories. If a person chooses to make unhealthy eating choices and becomes obese, they affect only their own health. American adults are perfectly capable of choosing their meals, and if that includes asking for the calorie count on their own, then they are perfectly capable of doing so. Living with an eating disorder is difficult enough without government exacerbating their calorie counting obsession.

ZAK Adds: Here are two articles about the socially contagious nature of obesity from the BBC here (citing research at Dartmouth College) and the International Herald Tribune here, which begins with the words “Obesity can spread from person to person, much like a virus.” Perhaps cigarettes and fatty foods are not so different after all, certainly the core principle at the heart of both issues is personal responsibility.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2010 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

Search

Archives

Links