Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
Frontrunners
You know we’re both amiable in our own sense—in our own senses, and I think that, basically, you know, us together produces a force of, uh, amiab—amiability which is, ahh, a synergical force of amiability which is, far beyond the reaches of normal human comprehension.
So sayeth George Z., one of four candidates for Student Union President a couple of years back at what I am objectively calling the best public high school in the nation, Stuyvesant High School, my alma mater.
In her new film Frontrunners, documentary filmmaker Caroline Suh has taken a magnifying glass to the most cutthroat high school elections around—complete with full-time campaign teams, pollsters, professional talking-heads, newspaper endorsements, and a televised debate.
The New York Times covered the film here:
Given the student body at Stuyvesant, which is exceptionally diverse, and exceptionally brilliant, it’s a little surprising that the subtitle of “Frontrunners” rings so true: “Even in High School, It’s Politics as Usual.” Candidates choose their running mates to round out their demographic profile (which means, at Stuyvesant, that one of the two candidates on a given ticket had better be Asian, or in with that crowd). Promises of bread and circuses are plentiful — cheaper candy from George, more dances and fashion shows from Hannah. The pundits of the school argue which is more important to political success, ethnicity or looks.
Frontrunners premiers this Wednesday, October 15, at the Film Forum cinema in New York. It opens in Boston, at the Brattle Theatre, on Friday, October 24. It plays in both locations for only a week. Please, if you find yourself so motivated, do go see it—and send me a report.
Our innovation this year was to go on top of the bridge. Our reasons are… fourfold. And number one, we’re the only ones on the bridge. Number two, they have to tilt their heads up and look at you—that establishes a subconscious notion of, uh, superiority and leadership—sort of lifting yourselves up on a pedestal. Number three, they’re usually too tired to even resist us; number four—uhhh… I think th—it’s threefold, actually.
Whatever happened to Mr. George Z., you ask? He is now a sophomore at Harvard.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…