Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Message to Congress: Hands Off of Our Schools | Home | And heap’d sedition on his crown at home »


In re Barack Obama’s ‘Qualifications’

There is some controversy over whether the McCain campaign’s characterization of Barack Obama’s abortion position—by any construction the most permissive of any prominent American politician—has been overwrought.

Specifically, supporters of Mr. Obama have in their inboxes this aft a note accusing Mr. McCain of a “despicable lie.” Mr. McCain’s lie is never mentioned; rather an independent television ad is, one that aired last week and featured a young woman who as a child survived an abortion attempt and, having done so, was permitted to live. The ad attacks Mr. Obama’s wilderness position on abortion, which includes the opinion that babies which have been born can still be “aborted.” No other congressional Democrat or Republican agrees with that view, and Mr. Obama is miffed that his opponent has decided to bring it up. But that view belongs to Mr. Obama despite his fresh chagrin. To wit, this state senate transcript of Mr. Obama from 2001:

[I]f we’re placing a burden on the doctor that says you have to keep alive a previable child as long as possible and give them as much medical attention as — as is necessary to try to keep that child alive, then we’re probably crossing the line in terms of unconstitutionality.
Which statement, after the gut recoil, merely causes one to wonder this: “Crossing the line in terms of unconstitutionality”? Has Barack Obama ever been within five miles of the University of Chicago School of Law?


No one has ever had a good look at Mr. Obama’s c.v. although his own campaign’s defenses give us to understand that “Ran for President” is at the top. Surely lawyer and professor of law are not far below. But in those latter jobs, one’s performance is measurable—one’s competence absolutely knowable. Wouldn’t a more reasonable man have made his argument for aborting everything in sight without so laughably dragging the constitution into it? If he were a conservative we could have some yucks over the fact that Genius David Axelrod is “Obama’s brain.” As it is that suggestion seems a little off-point. But only because we are made to think it so.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2012 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

Search

Archives

Links