Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« How many piano tuners are there in Chicago? | Home | The Consequences of Racial Preferencing »


Bucks for Barack

He is wrong on the issue, almost certainly a hypocrite, but I happen to think what Barack Obama is doing with respect to campaign financing is a pretty good thing. The issue is the principle of public financing and limits to the contributions that groups and individuals can make to a candidate along with hundreds of other regulations on advertising, support, etc. Barack Obama and John McCain support it, it being “campaign finance reform,” “limits on political speech,” or whatever you want to call it.

The difference between the two is that Obama has opted out of a key part of the system, public financing, despite his pledge to take it. His cover is that he maintains the particular system in place right now, much of it passed under the McCain-Feingold bill, does not work. I agree with Obama, notwithstanding the fact that he broke his pledge to take it and still supports strict controls on campaign speech (perhaps when it might be more convenient for him). McCain has a less nuanced position, which is to say his words and actions both converge on the wrong.

But I’ll return to Obama because an article about his fundraising successes is what prompted me to write these comments. Specifically Obama has raised $66 million in the past months, a record figure, made even more impressive by the unfortunate policy positions people with this money were convinced to support and by the fact that there were many thousands of individuals brought in to political giving by the Obama campaign. Perhaps most importantly, and admirably, although the last point is commendable as well, is that Obama’s success in this respect demonstrate the failings, practical and ideological, with campaign finance laws. On the practical side, an enterprising privately-funded candidate should be able to outraise candidates on the public dole, thus not having to obey many of the limitations and restrictions that come with taking that money, essentially (or potentially) making public financing a handicap. On the ideological side, Obama’s success demonstrates the idiocy of campaign finance laws to begin with, what is the point if millions of individuals and groups are already showing their support to the candidate they believe in, with contributions large and small, and making their voices heard?

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2012 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

Search

Archives

Links