Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« A Little Palpitation | Home | Ride On »


Gasp, a Gaffe

Ariana Huffington & Co. believe they have heard the first imperfection issue from Sarah Palin’s lips. They explain it thus:

Speaking before voters in Colorado Springs, the Republican vice presidential nominee claimed that lending giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had “gotten too big and too expensive to the taxpayers.” The companies, as McClatchy reported, “aren’t taxpayer funded but operate as private companies. The takeover may result in a taxpayer bailout during reorganization.”

Economists and analysts pounced on the misstatement, saying it demonstrated a lack of understanding about one of the key economic issues likely to face the next administration.

“You would like to think that someone who is going to be vice president and conceivable president would know what Fannie and Freddie do,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. “These are huge institutions and they are absolutely central to our country’s mortgage debt. To not have a clue what they do doesn’t speak well for her, I’d say.”

Ignore the bit about “economists pounced.” When a biased reporter wants to write something he feeds the line into a machine, and the machine produces a chirpy pocket-sized expert to whom that very line can be attributed.


The important thing is that the author’s story is entirely incorrect. Because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are two companies which are, indeed, too expensive for the taxpayers. The tremendous genius of the two companies—well, genius if you are F.D.R.; folly if you are living in enlightened, modern times—is that Fannie and Freddie are private-profit/public-loss companies. When they make money, they make money. And when they lose money, they are guaranteed by the government.

Well, guess what, baby? Their balance sheets aren’t healthy, and the loss belongs to the government, and the government is the public, and the public are the taxpayers. Sarah Palin is not only not a fool—she’s terribly lucid, concise, and clear in speaking about these complex matters.

UPDATE: Hoah, man. The Huffington Post is all Palin, all the time, all not entirely true. Creationism? Raised taxes? Iraq as Christian Crusade? What are there, only two moves in the How to Respond to a Biographically Superior Republican Opponent before absolute mad raving scandalism?

At least some Democrats acknowledge the silliness of their aspect. Here’s Wonkette, linking to a wild piece from Mother Jones: “Why is Sarah Palin hiding a secret stash of a million sexy racist emails sent to the Alaskan Monarchy? And why is Husband Todd always CCed when none of the emails pertain to snowmobiling?” Presumably she infected one of the emails with Down’s Syndrome, but then didn’t erase it because of her special kind of love.

It is true, at least in part, that Republicans have, outclassed, decided to do the vanity vamp. But, lo, they’re good at it! Intellectual liberals like Marty Peretz have screwed-up their faces and clicked together their heels because after a long period of being able to inject their thinking into the bloodstream of the nation through the backdoor of personality, they are now miffed they’ve lost their monopoly on the procedure. C’est tout.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2012 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement


admin

Calendar

October 2011
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

Search

Archives

Links