Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« On Deification | Home | Withdrawal »


Hedging Problem

I encountered the following mathematical puzzle recently, and found it so fascinating and so economically relevant that I had to share.

Credit for the puzzle goes to Peter Winkler.

Let us play a game of cards, shall we? I will be the dealer, you will be the bettor. The rules are simple. I take a standard deck of 52 playing cards and shuffle it well. I begin to flip over the cards in the deck, in sequence, one at a time. Immediately before each flip, you have the opportunity to bet any amount of money that you have, from $0 to everything you have, on the color of the card that I am about to flip. So, for instance, if you have $5 and I am about to flip a card, you may either do nothing, bet any amount of money up to $5 that the card will be red, or bet any amount of money up to $5 that the card will be black. A correct bet of $x wins you $x; an incorrect bet costs you $x.

You begin the game with $100. At any point in the game, you can recall perfectly the sequence of cards that has been flipped. To simplify things, assume that dollars are continuously divisible. That is, whenever you chose to bet, you can bet any positive number of dollars; you need not stick to multiples of a cent.

Now the questions is: What is the maximum amount of money you can be guaranteed to have once the deck is through, and what betting strategy should you use to achieve this outcome?

As a place to start, notice that there is a simple way to guarantee yourself $200. Just wait until I am about to flip the 52nd card, and at that point, bet your entire $100 on the color you know that card to be.

How much better can you do?

The very surprising solution, coming soon.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2012 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

Search

Archives

Links