Dartblog
Special Feature: The Dartmouth College Case, Round Two
Dartmouth's 70,000 alumni have brought suit against the College Administration, asking for enforcement of an 1891 Agreement granting alumni the right to elect half of the College's Trustees. The judge's first ruling? In favor of the alumni. Read rolling updates here.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Ending the Lawsuit in 9 Seconds | Home | Israeli Independence Day »
In his column in today’s issue of The Dartmouth, the Board-packing candidate for president of the Association of Alumni John Mathias ‘69, makes a number of statements well off the mark.
Mr. Mathias begins his column, admirably, by talking about the need to “focus on undergraduate education” and “administer highly complex operations wisely and efficiently” with “institutional vision and dynamic personality.” Mr. Mathias almost seemed to be running on the ideas of recently elected Trustee Stephen Smith ‘88.
In any event the opinion piece quickly went south. Mathias started up with the old refrain that the lawsuit is frivolous and divisive, the same position he evidently takes on Trustee elections. Frivolous? A New Hampshire Superior Court Judge has ruled that the lawsuit has merit on 3 separate counts? Divisive? What is divisive about supporting the right of alumni to vote? See here for how the Association of Alumni lawsuit can be brought to an end in 9 seconds.
Next, Mathias attempts to polarize the issue by contending that somehow The Dartmouth Review is linked with the lawsuit. This is a deliberate obfuscation of the issue, and not a very good one at that. Firstly the Review was hardly around in 1891 when the contract for Parity was made. More importantly, the democratic right of alumni to vote for 50% of the Board of Trustees is not in any respect a partisan issue.
Then Mathias turns to the cost of the lawsuit, which even according to his assuredly partisan figures, costs significantly less than the hair that occupied the library last spring and summer.
Finally Mathias attempts to promote the diversity of his slate, a woefully inadequate claim. There is simply no getting around the fact that opposition to democracy is an inherent affront to diversity. Democracy, which is to say the right of alumni to elect members of the Board of Trustees (or the A of A for that matter), means the ability to consider persons with all types of ideas and opinions and backgrounds for the positions. It is decidedly regressive to believe that diversity might come from a handful of trustees handpicking (or packing as the case might be) their successors in a smoke-filled backroom.
Mathias calls for unity, but if Dartmouth unified in his direction we would have serious problems. In addition to being unified, it is also probably a good idea to be right. And what better way to ascertain rightness than to have free and fair elections? That is exactly what this debate is about. The Board-packing slate wants all the trustees to think alike, to think like them. The Pro-parity slate wants to preserve the right of all Dartmouth alumni to give their input and opinions and suggestions and criticism through the democratic ballot box.
Further reading:
Some thoughts in support of the lawsuit
An analysis of Parity
A little Board-packing satire
Featured posts
Dartblog Specials
- The Dartmouth College Case
- 2007 Trustee Election
- Dartmouth Constitution
- Sunday Morning Sinatra
- The Indian Wars
Donate
Please note
This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.
All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2008 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.
Advertisement
adminCalendar
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Archives
Search
Links
- //Drudge Report
- //AP News
- //Fox News
- //Reuters News
- ABC's The Note
- Andrew Marcus
- Agenda Gap
- Alex Ross
- And Rightly So
- Ann Althouse
- Armavirumque
- Atrios
- Audio Review
- Belgian Prince
- Brad Plumer
- Brussels Journal
- Buzzmachine
- CENTCOM
- Classical Values
- Conservative Thinking
- The Corner
- Craig Sanders
- Coyote Blog
- DartWire
- DartmouthBiz
- Dartmouth Observer
- Dartmouth Review
- Dartmouth Student Assemblog
- Democracy Project
- Different River
- Drew Cline
- Emmett Hogan
- Engadget
- Everyman
- Fresh Politics
- GOP Bloggers
- Hanover Collaboration
- Hatemonger's Quarterly
- Hispanic Pundit
- Hugh Hewitt
- Instapundit
- Iraq the Model
- Jacob Laksin
- Jeff Harrell
- Jen Krimm
- Language Log
- Lawrence Lessig
- Little Green Footballs
- Maggie's Farm
- Marginal Utility
- Matt Nolan
- Maroon Blog
- MN Publius
- McSweeney's
- No Oil for Pacifists
- New Hampshire Green
- New York Radio
- Oh, That Liberal Media
- Old Traditions
- Opinio Juris
- Opinion Journal
- Overheard at Dartmouth
- Pax Plena
- Power Line
- Paul Sand
- RealClearPolitics
- Rick Lee
- Right Side of the Rainbow
- Robert Hansen
- Roger L. Simon
- Samizdata
- Scott Adams
- Scott Burgess
- SCOTUS Blog
- SCSU Scholars
- Super Dartmouth
- TalkLeft
- Terry Teachout
- The MI Guy
- The Moderate Voice
- NRO's The Corner
- NRO's Phi Beta Cons
- Press Gaggle
- The Vatican of Liberalism
- TigerHawk
- Trey Jackson
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Vital Perspective
- Vox Baby
- The Wayward Episcopalian
- WSJ - Washington Wire
- Weekend Pundit
- Wizbang Blog
- Wonkette