Welcome to Dartmouth's most influential daily
Each day, Dartblog and its team of alumni and students bring you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large. Read our iPhone edition here.
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
So Sue Me
Dartmouth Writing ‘Lecturer’ Threatens Suit Against Students, College, Superiors; Displeased with Negative Performance Evaluations; Poor Prose Ability Revealed in Late-Night Missives; General Mockery Made of Freshman Writing Program.
A series of curious emails from Priya Venkatesan, who is a “lecturer” of writing at Dartmouth College, a former postdoctoral fellow at the Dartmouth Medical School, a 1990 graduate of the College—doubling in biochemistry and comparative literature—a holder of a U.C. Davis master’s in genetics, and finally a Ph. D. in, alack, literature from U.C. San Diego, have produced a Sunday spectacle of tremendous succulence.
With her agglomerate of degrees Ms. Venkatesan secured a job at Dartmouth teaching College freshman the art of writing. She is one of a stable of non-professors yoked by Dartmouth with this task, good writing remaining a low priority among the deanery; this past winter she taught “Science, Technology and Society,” one of several introductory writing courses, all referred to as Writing 5, for budding young collegians.
This is not Strunk & White, mind. This is holistic—hence the biologist-scrivener, and the usual catastrophe: a collection of students irked at having whiled away three months being hazed by “social constructedness” and still lacking a solid apprehension of the expository essay. The public course reviews were not flattering. Probably the inter-departmental evaluations, completed by students and read by the professor’s superiors, were still more candid.
Yesterday evening, to the students of her winter class, Ms. Venkatesan dispatched this message:
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:56:35 -0400 (EDT)The note was first published by The Dartmouth Review. This page has independently confirmed Ms. Venkatesan’s authorship. It was sent to all students who took her class last term. To a subset, those who have stirred the young writing instructor’s wrath, she sent this:
To: “WRIT.005.17.18-WI08”:;, Priya.Venkatesan@Dartmouth.EDU
Subject: WRIT.005.17.18-WI08: Possible lawsuit
Dear former class members of Science, Technology and Society:
I tried to send an email through my server but got undelivered messages. I regret to inform you that I am pursuing a lawsuit in which I am accusing some of you (whom [sic] shall go unmentioned in this email) of violating Title VII of anti-federal [sic] discrimination laws.
The feeling that I am getting from the outside world is that Dartmouth is considered a bigoted place, so this may not be news and I may be successful in this lawsuit.
I am also writing a book detailing my experiences as your instructor, which will “name names” so to speak. I have all of your evaluations and these will be reproduced in the book.
Have a nice day.
Dear Student:At least seven members of the Class of 2011 received this grave epistle, indicating that they are to be named as defendants in a legal outing under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination by employers on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The students, of course, are entirely safe; as they do not employ the writing instructor, it can only be said that their evaluations of her performance—de rigueur, frank, and ostensibly anonymous—did not flatter, and that she is upset. But of course the students could not have discriminated against her.
Please disregard the previous email sent by Priya Venkatesan. [The one about a ‘possible’ lawsuit. -jm] This is to officially inform you that you are being accused of violating Title VII pertaining to federal anti-discrimination laws, by the plaintiff, Priya Venkatesan. You are being specifically accused of, but not limited to, [sic] harassment. Please do not respond to this email as it will be used against you in a court of law.
Priya Venkatesan, PhD
Ms. Venkatesan also informs Dartblog that she is “pursuing a legal suit against members/former members of the Dartmouth community,” those being Christopher H. Lowrey of the medical school and his four-person research team. “Another faculty member,” Ms. Venkatesan tells us, “that figures prominently in my list of grievances…is Thomas H. Cormen, Ph. D., Director of the Writing Program (now the Institute for Writing and Rhetoric) and Professor of Computer Science.”
This column solicited a thought or two from Priya Venkatesan, and was rewarded with the following:
The students I am naming in this suit were mostly from Winter 08 term with a few from Fall. Essentially, I am pursuing litigation to see if I have a legal claim, that is, if the inappropriate and unprofessional behavior I was subjected to as a Research Associate and Lecturer at Dartmouth constitutes discrimination and harrassment [sic] on the basis of ethnicity, race and gender. This includes not just students, but a few faculty members that I worked with. At this stage, I am making a detailed list of names in a chronology of what people said and did while I was at Dartmouth in a very factual manner and approaching a New Hampshire attorney who specializes in professional malpractice with the chronology and he will make the determination if I have grounds for litigation.A redaction of errata seems a suitable place to begin. A class action suit? This involves a population of plaintiffs similarly aggrieved; Ms. Venkatesan is contemplating legal action against a population of defendants similarly, in her mind, guilty. Classes bring suit; they do not answer it. Thus it is not a class action, but a series of civil complaints against students and employees of the College and, perhaps, the College corporate.
Title VII does not include language about harassment—only about discrimination. Courts have occasionally elected to find harassment illegal under the code, but only, like discrimination, employer-perpetrated harassment. Since students are not Ms. Venkatesan’s employers, they cannot be named as defendants in a Title VII case.
Finally, there is the bit about “pursuing litigation to see if I have a legal claim.” This is not an advisable course of action. In fact, legal experts consulted by this page suggest that litigating to explore the possible existence of a legal claim is the precise opposite of how the modern judicial system operates.
UPDATE: The faculty listing for the Dartmouth Writing Program contains a footer announcing: “Last modified: Sunday, 27-Apr-2008 14:55:36 EDT.” This puts the last change at just a few hours after this post first appeared. The change? Priya Venkatesan is no longer listed.
UPDATE: The photograph originally attending this piece has been removed in response to a request from Tom Cormen, Chairman of the Writing Program.
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…