Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
Elitism and Elitists v. Eliteness and Elites
In the discussion of Barack Obama, one of the important things that get lost is the difference between being elite and being an elitist, see CNN’s discussion of “Will the ‘elitist’ label stick to Obama.”
I posted a few days ago about Obama’s elitist comments, namely his disparaging remarks towards the faith and exercise of individual rights of others. This is Obama being an elitist, this certainly has no positive correlation with Obama’s level of eliteness or being elite at all.
In my mind the distinction between the two concepts is a sharp one. Being elite is good. Being elitist is bad. Elite is the last 8 teams standing in the NCAA tournament or a BMW 3-series or honor roll students at a local high school. These things are all good. Elitism, or being elitist, are not terms that simply describe the phenomenon of eliteness as an attitude or adjective, they are of an entirely different meaning altogether. Elitist comments, like those of Obama, put oneself on a self-righteous pedestal (for Dartmouth student readers, somewhat like a massive self-call). An elitist will denigrate other people, disparage their views, and depreciate their beliefs, maintaining that they occupy some sort of privileged intellectual position from which they, and they alone, can see the right. But of course this haughty attitude does not make a person any more right or elite.
I have heard commentary to the effect of: well, anyone who runs for president must ipso facto be an elitist because they necessarily believe they can make decisions for 300 million people. It is certainly true that many men who have served as president have been elite in the sense that they have been the most qualified person to hold the position, Washington and Jefferson come to mind, perhaps Kennedy, Reagan, and others. But seeking or occupying this position does not mean a person is an elitist. Indeed the political positions of nearly all parties on some issues and of some parties on all issues, stand for the notion that individuals are better equipped to make decisions for themselves than is the government or anybody else. This is very antithesis of political elitism.
In short, being elite (good) and being an elitist (bad) are two separate, very different phenomena. Persons can certainly be, and usually are, one without the other. Obama’s comments that faith in religion and respect for individual gun rights are necessarily some sort of false consciousness represent the worst type of elitism.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…