Archived post

This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.

« Funny Mugs | Home | Bureaucracy Problem? »


Wright, Farrakhan, Hamas for Obama

The aphorism about media attention is variously stated as ‘bad press is better than no press’ and ‘there is no such thing as bad press…’ but I don’t believe the same principle can be said to hold for political endorsements.

A interesting post on Power Line about the endorsement of Barack Obama in the Democratic primary and (potentially) the general election…by Hamas. Specifically the endorsement was made by the chief political adviser to Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas prime minister in Gaza. Perhaps cute little “Terrorists for Obama” will start popping up.

Obama has already been endorsed by notoriously racist and antisemitic and Louis Farrakhan, although to be fair he rejected and denounced this endorsement. Meanwhile his pastor said that Farrakhan “epitomizes greatness,” Wright a man who said “No, no, no, not G-d Bless America. G-d damn America — that’s in the Bible.” It’s not that Obama should be held accountable for the statements and actions of all his supporters but he can control his associations (e.g. with his pastor). And the question remains, what is it about Obama that endears him to so many unsavory characters?

The jury is still out on the al-Qaeda/ bin Laden endorsement…I will post an update if I hear anything.

JAKE ADDS: But, thinking from a game-theoretic perspective, Hamas surely realizes that its “endorsement” will detract support from any candidate. Thus, Hamas would reasonably choose to endorse the candidate it most fears—the candidate it thinks would deal it the most damage.

(And of course, it makes sense that Hamas would prefer McCain to Obama: People who make musical puns like “bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran” don’t exactly endear potential jihadists to the United States.)

Now, thinking one step still further, if both Hamas and the American public are rational actors, which is questionable in both cases, Hamas would realize that we would realize the above. And we realize that Hamas would realize that we would realize it. And so on. So the effect of Hamas’s endorsement is unpredictable. The game-theoretic fact of the matter is thus that Hamas should choose at random which candidate to endorse. Therefore under the assumption that both entites are rational, Hamas’s endorsement tells us nothing about which candidate it most fears.

My hypothesis is that the American public, not knowing any game theory, is not a rational actor, but that Hamas’s strategy people, despite being terrorists, are. We can safely assume Americans won’t use my line of reasoning, but rather will just turn away from any candidate Hamas endorses. In that case my first analysis is correct: Hamas wants McCain to win, and is therefore endorsing Obama.

Featured posts

  • October 18, 2009
    When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
    We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but…
  • October 9, 2009
    D Afraid of a Little Competish
    So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,…
  • September 4, 2009
    How Regents Should Reign
    As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one…
  • August 29, 2009
    Election Reform Study Committee
    If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called…
  • August 23, 2009
    Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
    And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had…
  • May 31, 2009
    Kangaroo Court, Indeed
    In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…

Dartblog Specials

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Help, Pecuniarily

Please note

This website reflects the personal opinions of its authors. Any e-mails received may be published along with the full name of the sender. If you wish otherwise, please say so.

All content appearing at Dartblog.com should be presumed copyright 2004-2010 its respective bylined author unless otherwise noted or unless linked to original source.

Advertisement

admin

Calendar

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

Search

Archives

Links