Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Judicial Feelings (née constitutionalism) | Home | Ticker Tape Parade »
The Reason of and Reason for Our Right
Because it is such an interesting issue that has such a great bearing on the safety of college students (and indeed all people) across the country, I hope you, my dear reader, will permit me yet another post on gun rights.
The movement for a renewal of gun rights on campus is growing. Students for Concealed Carry on Campus (SCCC), a group that emerged after the Virginia Tech massacre, now has thousands upon thousands of members. I would like to respond briefly to a few of the most common objections to such a policy (and I hope you will join me on the other side of the jump).
But first news from the Jerusalem massacre of 8 students at a Jewish seminary by an Arab terrorist gunman…
[The shooter] was shot and killed by Yitzhak Dadon, an off-duty army officer, who occasionally studied at the seminary. “He came out of the library spraying automatic fire … the terrorist came to the entrance and I shot him twice in the head,” said Mr Dadon, who, like many Israeli men, carries a weapon at all times.
1. “More guns increase the likelihood of gun accidents.” The possibility of, say, guns in the hands of drunken fraternity brothers is often cited. In 2005 nearly 17,000 deaths resulted from alcohol-related driving fatalities, yet we are not attempting to ban cars on campus or anywhere else. Currently firearm accidents account for .6% of accidental deaths, less than motor vehicles (39%), poisoning (18%), falls (16%), suffocation (5%), drowning (2.9%), fires (2.8%), medical mistakes (2.2%), environmental factors (1.2%), and bicycles and tricycles (0.7%).
2. “Campus shooters are irrational, so concealed carry will not deter crime.” Violent criminals (like the shooters at Virginia Tech and NIU) may be not be persuaded not to kill by rational discourse over policy, but they can be shot.
3. “There is a high potential for misuse.” The state of Utah permits concealed carry on campus already; they have had neither accidents nor campus shootings. Concealed carry off-campus has similarly not led to a high prevalence of accidents. Most states already have preexisting requirements for concealed carry permits on top of checks at the stage of purchasing a firearm. Only folks trained and qualified to carry firearms will be permitted to have them on campus, as in the population at large.
4. “Guns will facilitate other crimes.” Quite the contrary. Among the amici who wrote briefs supporting gun rights in D.C. v Heller, a gun rights case before the Supreme Court, were Jews, African-Americans, LGBT, handicapped and disabled persons, and women. All of these groups recognize that guns level the playing field, allowing historically marginalized and victimized groups to protect themselves in the face of crime.
5. “We need less guns on campus, not more.” The campuses on which shootings have taken place have not allowed guns. It cannot be repeated too many times, especially because many people seem not to understand the point: someone seeking to massacre scores of students is unlikely to care that they are violating state (or school) gun policy. To rephrase and repeat, someone willing to murder (which there are also laws against) will not be deterred by gun bans on campus.
Reasonable people may disagree on the issue of gun rights, but every level of discourse on the subject let’s have a debate based on fact and logic not, as Jenn aptly put it, “knee jerk reactions to emotional stimuli.”
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…