Dartblog
Special Feature: Give a Rouse
Whither the College on the Hill? Dartblog brings you news and commentary from Hanover and the world at large, including deep coverage of the maturing tenure of Dr. Kim.
Archived post
This is an archived post. Please click here to see the latest entries.
« Quick Programming Note | Home | Desperate people do desperate things »
Dirges for Dartmouth
This morning’s editions of The Wall Street Journal point out the diminishing of Dartmouth at the hands of sensitive collegians who do not want their performance closely reviewed. “Your average banana republic is more transparent,” the Journal notes, without a hint of levity.
And they are precisely right. One need only consider the insulting and dishonest opening words of Chairman Ed Haldeman in this audio interview, when he was asked why the Board made such drastic changes. “I got my job in June and it seemed to be a reasonable activity to ask our Governance Committee to do sort of a clean slate appraisal of the governance structure at Dartmouth. I think it is a healthy thing for boards to do on a periodic basis,” he said.
The New Criterion’s James Panero also weighs in with “the tanks of Tienanmen roll onto the Dartmouth Green.” “This is a dark day for the school,” James writes.
What’s so unfortunate is that people like Ed Haldeman will risk destroying Dartmouth to save his consolidation of power. It is interesting to note that Alumni giving reached record levels of participation after the election of the four petition candidates and the defeat of the new constitution. I gave a donation to the school for the very first time. But Haldeman does not care about such statistics, nor does he care if he turns off thousands of loyal alums in the process. Haldeman has called the petition elections “politicized, costly, and divisive”—these are elections that alumni voted in. Are their votes divisive?A good point. Right down to the consideration that bloggers who support Trustee candidates ought to be censored because they are engaging in ‘campaigning,’ this power grab will prove detrimental to Dartmouth for many reasons, not least the illiberal arrogance with which it was carried through.
On a lighter note, The New York Times maintained its tradition of rigorous fact checking by referring, in this article on the Dartmouth fracas, to a super-secret senior society at Dartmouth and quoting as official a gag website created by Dartmouth’s Jack-o-Lantern humor group.
Featured posts
-
October 18, 2009
When Love Beckoned in 52nd Street
We were at San Francisco’s BIX last evening, enjoying prosecco, cheese, and a bit of music. A full year of inhabitation in Northern California has unraveled to me no decent venue for proper lounging, but… -
October 9, 2009
D Afraid of a Little Competish
So our colleague and Dartblog writer Joe Asch informed me that the D has rejected our cunning advertising campaign. Uh-oh. The Dartmouth is widely known as a breeding ground for instant New York Times successes,… -
September 4, 2009
How Regents Should Reign
As Dartmouth alumni proceed through the legal hoops necessary to defuse a Board-packing plan—which put in unhappy desuetude an historic 1891 Agreement between alumni and the College guaranteeing a half-democratically-elected Board of Trustees—it strikes one… -
August 29, 2009
Election Reform Study Committee
If you are an alum of the College on the Hill, you may have received a number of e-mails of late beseeching your input for a new arm of the College’s Alumni Control Apparatus called… -
August 23, 2009
Fare Thee Well, Tom Crady
And now Dean Tom Crady has precipitously announced his departure from the College after only 20 months on the job. How to read this? By way of background, prior to coming to Dartmouth, Crady had… -
May 31, 2009
Kangaroo Court, Indeed
In an interview with The Dartmouth, alumni-elected trustee T.J. Rodgers ‘70 explained his reasons for declining to participate in future evaluations of trustees up for “re-election,” namely the “kangaroo court” nature of such discussion in…